Newt is far from perfect...
... but as it turns out, there is no Ronaldus Magnus running in 2012, so perfect isn’t the issue this time around.
We will vote based on imperfect and decide whose baggage is small enough, whose values match ours enough, who is closest to meeting up to the job enough, despite their serious flaws.
Newt has a problem. He can explode.
Newtonium is this way - volatile. It must be held in check by outside control - the House, the Senate, some counsel of reasonable advisers in the inner circle.
Newtonium also has advantages to consider...
It can cause large change, create ideas outside the box, build strategies, etc.
If Newt can trump RINOmney, I’m for him. Willard has no force of change. He is an administrator, manager, status quo wimp.
It will not be pretty, if he wins, but Newt, under control by outside forces may bring dramatic changes.
Anything else will not fix the severe problems in the country.
I would prefer Perry to Newt, but he ain’t risin’ yet and may not.
Newtonium also has advantages to consider...
It can cause large change, create ideas outside the box, build strategies, etc.
Yours is one of the better (and more creative) rationales I've seen for giving our votes to Newt. Very well done.
Newtonium....I like it!