Neither. Both aren’t close to being equipped to run the free world. Palin is even less equipped and electable than the Huckster.
Small libertarians and independents aren't going to support Huckabee because of his fiscal liberalism, his wishy-washy leadership, & belief in the nanny-state.
Before you can win the general election, you have to win over your base. The base is not enthusiastic over Huckster as they are with Sarah, and Sarah will still pull in social conservative votes.
Saying that Sarah is unelectable is a crock and a cop-out. She has the conservative base locked up. Enthusiasm from the conservative base will pull in undecideds and independents, who by nature are bandwagoners, not people who hold deep political convictions.
Simply saying such a thing does not make it so, my friend.
Sarah Palin's 18 year record of public service has been scrutinized and analyzed on this website, and throughout cyberspace for over two years now. On just this one website, literally thousands of individual minds have performed a monumental and intensive examination of her qualifications and experience, and have given her their highest marks. She is without doubt, the most vetted potential presidential candidate in US history.
Another thing... The eventual winner of the Republican nomination will have to have the backing of the Tea Parties. As of now, Sarah Palin is the overwhelming favorite among Tea Partiers and like-minded patriot rebels.
Huck doesn't have anywhere near the sort of standing with the Tea Parties that Sarah Palin does. Neither does Mitt. That's your top tier. All of the other usual suspects are in the second or third tier of potential hopefuls.
You may as well get prepared to vote for Palin for president, because that's who our nominee is going to be.
LOL