Bttt
The 85% cut was governor’s expenses. In other word Gov Murkowski spent 85% more on himself to do his job
x’s that 1,000 - and then we can literally wipe out the scourge that resides in this country right now.
Thru her PAC or what?
She deserves a fair shake. A dollar or two from every common person who identifies with her will create a wave no politico can endure.
When McCain added Palin to his ticket, reporters converged on Alaska, and left no stone unturned. They couldn’t dig up anything on her. Since they couldn’t find a skeleton, they came up with....”She pretended to be prego to cover up for her daughter’s teenage pregnancy”. I mean, come on. It’s been unbelievable how the media has an all out war on her and her family. I don’t ever remember hearing candidates’ children being reported about on the news the way Sarah Palin’s children have been.
First female vp on 2008 republican ticket, maybe, but not first female vp candidate, at least in modern times. Remember Geraldine Ferraro?
A History of Palin Accomplishments: Part 1, Wasilla City Council 1992 – 1996
A History of Palin Accomplishments: Part 2, Wasilla Mayor 1996 – 2002
A History of Palin, Part 3: Oil and Gas Conservation Commission 2003 – 2004
The Integrity Gap, Part I of III: Gov. Sarah Palin
Maybe as President she can do that Nationwide.
Each Alaska resident had been getting about 2 grand , with her tax hike each citizen got 3 grand or so without getting out of bed. Cool free money.
The writer says the oil companies were against the hike . Gee, do you think so? I bet those sneaking oil companies tried to pass it on to their customers.
Instead of bailing out corporations like Obama, the Oil tax is a shake down like Jesse Jacksons ,the difference is it is being done in the citizens name.
Own any oil stocks in your portfolio?
Extracting a state income tax of 25% from oil companies but a maximum of 9% on other corporations and zero on individuals does not seem conservative. Is she a gorbal warming believer? She does agree with Obama that government and not the market should determine how your electricity is generated.
Why is a law mandating a percentage of energy that must be renewable a good thing? I didn't like it when Obama talked was doing it, did you?
Alaska's renewable energy seems to be hydro and biomass generating. Bio mass as in burning wood. Is that a source of co2 emissions? Fine with me, but one of the stated purposes in Alaska renewable program is the reduction of green house gases. I don't see either of these accomplishments as conservative nor even good government policy.
Have a wonderful Thanksgiving, sir!