The GOP has a deep bench of experience and viability. Many of them are certainly more qualified to be POTUS than Hussein, and arguably than Palin who resigned after about 2 years in office.
Same rot that people were saying about Ronald Reagan. If she does get the nomination, she will win in a landslide the like of which hasn’t been seen since Ronaldus Magnus.
Ronald Reagan was governor of California, the 11th largest economy in the world, for 8 long years. I think he had a bit more experience than Sarah, and he brought electoral votes. Last I checked the people of Alaska had soundly rejected Sarah's protege for Senate. As much as I like Palin, I don't see her as the GOP's best choice and find her fans to be increasingly cult-like. I wouldn't mind of course, were she to win. I would mind exceedingly if this foolishness provided Hussein with four more years. That must not happen.
“The GOP has a deep bench of experience and viability.”
‘Samatta, afraid of the “C” word?
Character. It’s all about character, in principio, et nunc, et in saecula saeculorum. All the “experience and viability” in the world aren’t a drop in the ocean without character.
Character can succeed—and has often succeeded—without your “experience and viability,” but without character, you only get the likes of Jumpin’ Jim Jeffords, Pimpin’ Newt Gingrich the serial abandoner of sick wives, Juan McLame, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Governor Palin is the only suitable candidate.
“Many of them are certainly more qualified to be POTUS than Hussein”
A sack of leper butts is more qualified to be president than the Kenyan commie.
“and arguably than Palin who resigned after about 2 years in office.”
General quarters, general quarters, set material condition Zebra throughout the site. CIC has incoming Demonrat talking points. Stand by for nasty rolls.
Whether a person supports Governor Palin or—stupidly—does not, I cannot believe that a conservative would actually use that particularly vile clump of snot from Satan’s nose in an argument.
I’m not even going to explain to you why that argument is completely without merit—nay, dumber than a box of hammers and more dishonest than an Acorn meeting—because I don’t believe you don’t already know.
“Ronald Reagan was governor of California, the 11th largest economy in the world, for 8 long years.”
I don’t hear anybody running down governors of Rhode Island or Delaware because their states are so small. I think Alaska is...oh, yeah, bigger than California, with significant resources to manage.
“I think he had a bit more experience than Sarah”
See if you can force yourself to utter the word, “character.” If it feels like you’re actually going to injure yourself, though, give it up. Reagan had character in spades, and so does Governor Palin.
Governor Moonbeam has been elected governor of Califoria for the third time. Looks like he’s more qualified to be president than Reagan, by your standards.
“and he brought electoral votes.”
If a person doesn’t bring character, they can’t come. That’s the rule, and it’s one we’ve been ignoring for too long. No character, no vote. The only GOP politician who demonstrates even the tiniest scintilla of character is Governor Palin.
“Last I checked the people of Alaska had soundly rejected Sarah’s protege for Senate.”
My God, you are a democrat, aren’t you?
I would invite you to look into the subject of election fraud, which seems to have escaped your notice.
“I don’t see her as the GOP’s best choice”
How fortunate for our country that you are mistaken.
“and find her fans to be increasingly cult-like.”
I don’t get the daily democrat talking-points email. I guess this is one way to keep up with what’s in it.
“That must not happen.”
Better that than that the Opposition-in-Name-Only, the RINO operated GOP, should foist another “communist tyranny in 20 years, not 10” president on us.
Victory is the only option. If not now, when? When are we going to stop voting for the “candidate” that the party elite tells us is most “electible,” and start voting for the best person for the job?