You can’t beat someone with no one. Arbitrarily comparing a candidate to a theoretical perfect candidate is meaningless.
Amen LCS.
These "concerned" posters lecturing people about their Palin pick, yet they offer no alternative...
>>You can’t beat someone with no one. Arbitrarily comparing a candidate to a theoretical perfect candidate is meaningless.
“Amen LCS.
These “concerned” posters lecturing people about their Palin pick, yet they offer no alternative.”
<<
There is no forensic onus in pointing out that something/someone is bad to then provide a “good” substitute. If we select Mrs. Palin as the candidate (which I doubt will happen anyway), she will lose (IMHO) and we will be stuck with the TOTUS-reader for another 4 years. Her minuses I have laid out (and they are still unrefuted).
I can tell you that (again IMHO, since people think that any post that doesn’t SAY “IMHO” is stated as a fact) NONE of the candidates in 2008 should run again. They all stink (IMHO).
We need some fresh blood — Demint? Bonds? I don’t know about who would be better, but I am pretty sure who we should NOT run.
And I am not alone. That is what you should be concentrating on.
Oh — IMHO.