facts are a thing of the past
Joan used the word “race” 15 times. Not too shabby.
Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
Facts get in the way of the narrative.
What do they smoke in their alternate universe?
This article is akin to the rant resident dumbass Bill Maher leveled at George Will after being put in his place at the ABC roundtable.
Poor Joan made a moronic statement that she thought she could get away with and got put in her place. Now she writes and ex post facto rewriting of what really happened.
I guess it’s all in the “context”.
It’s so sad when low-wattage people like Joan Walsh try to shine like the big boys...
I predicted the meme on Sherrod (when truth came out) would be “how dare you criticize her after all she’s been through.”
She would be the new Cindy Sheehan.
Sorry. I'm convinced.
Let's see... Holder's suppression of the suit against the New Black Panthers; Van Jones; Mark Lloyd's considered appointment; the Cambridge Police acting stupidly; redistributionist health and tax policies; bowing to the Saudis but dissing the English and the Israelis;... I could go on... and on... but dinner's ready.
Breitbart set out to demonstrate racism with the NAACP. He succeeded, but not entirely in the way he thought he was succeeding. Sherrod is without a doubt a racist. If she gets a pass to say whatever she wants about race because her father was murdered by a white racist, I get a pass to say whatever I want about women because my ex-wife was granted a divorce and obscene levels of support by a liberal feminist. I don’t buy either argument, because two wrongs don’t make a right. All I will say is that no one has to slur Joan — she’s a talking slur directed to herself everytime she opens her mouth.
All I can say is Sherod now knows how Clarence Thomas felt. I wonder what Sherod’s take on that was. Somehow I think I know.
Joan lives in an alternate universe where the facts are whatever she thinks they are and time lines are convenient to the slanderous tales she wants to tell.
Gad, the spew. Get a paper towel and let’s wipe this up. uck.
The dems want to know what happened to the other 7 states.
The ad hominem attack is the last grasp of a debater who knows they have lost.
Pulling the “race” card is nothing more than an ad hominem attack.
“the Democratic party is run by corrupt black people trying to give blacks advantages over whites”
Yobama, Holder, Van Jones.
If the Marxists want to refer to speaking the truth as “scaring old, white people”, so be it.
Just so long as those “old, white people” are given the facts about the corrupt Kenyan usurper and his lapdogs, be they “people of color” or not.
In an article dissing fox for failing to check facts, you should have checked your facts
(not you 2nd Div- the author)
"But I also want to state for the record: Fox ran with the story before Sherrod was fired. It was on FoxNews.com during the day on Monday July 19 – it's gone now, so I can't check the exact time it was posted."
Gosh... too lazy to 'check the exact time'??? but yet confident enough to stat a 'fact' ???
Well Fox aired the story hours AFTER the white house fired her.
what exactly was 'false' about Andrew's story? He wasn't beating up on Shirley Sherrod, nor did he demand, much less suggest, that she be fired. He was simply pointing out that even in that august group, the NAACP, there exists racism, so they shouldn't be passing resolutions against Tea Partiers.
They claim th ACORN video some hoe o not show them conspiring to arrange for underage prostitutes and that ACORN was scammed by employees filing fake registrations... Thats a nice way of putting it when you PAY people to fake register ("Gosh we got scammed by our own employess")