Go right ahead...The Dangerous part is Stupid “Country Club” Republicans listen to the Progressives....ex.(John McCain). Basicly they have told us upfront nominate Mitt if you want to lose in 2012.........
Wonder if Barney Frank is up for a run....LOL...Rush would have probably spend his entire show uncontrolably laughing......
absent makes mitt grow fonder in leftist heart
They scared to death She will run...
Wonder how much of his fortune Romney is spending to get this ¨message¨ out. The guy is a loser; I honestly wouldn´t vote if he were the candidate. But that´s probably what the Dems, who are no doubt behind this, want.
"I'm not running as the Republican view or a continuation of Republican values.
That's not what brings me to the race.
(Romney Video, accessed 9/19/07)
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldnt make any sense at all.""
-- President Ronald Reagan
"I'm very clear I think, to the people across the Commonwealth
my "R" didn't stand so much for Republican as it does for reform."
(Romney Video, accessed 9/19/07)
"A political party cannot be all things to all people.
It must represent certain fundamental beliefs
which must not be compromised to political expediency
or simply to swell its numbers."
-- President Ronald Reagan
Bush's Media Pass, by Ted S. McGregor, Jr.
~snip~
Which brings us to the strange case of George W. Bush. It's hard to argue the point that Bush has never had to stand up to the level of scrutiny and derision that Gore or Clinton did. Bill Clinton had to endure investigations over missing files, the suicide of a friend and a real estate deal in which he actually lost money. Bush has a hard time getting investigated for taking the nation to war under an apparently manufactured rationale something that could, in time, be viewed among the nation's most notorious scandals. Then there's Monica, which Clinton clearly deserved to be scrutinized for. But impeachment? Note how there's absolutely no coverage in the media about impeaching Bush for his alleged crimes. Remember, it's not about what you did; it's about lying about what you did if you're a Democrat.Then there's the way Al Gore was treated in 2000. You'll recall the running joke about how stiff Al Gore was, and later how he thought he invented the Internet (snicker) and dreamed up that he was the basis for a character in the book and film Love Story. These stories were pushed by Republican operatives and Fox News, and Gore was pummeled over them. But most voters don't remember that, in fact, he did run the first Congressional investigation on amping up the Internet and he was the basis for a character in Love Story. Corrections, when they ran, were never as big as the story in the first place.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA.
Safe...at least as much so as anybody in or likely to be in the Republican field, if not more so, and more so than the incumbent.
Sane...at least as much so as anybody in or likely to be in the Republican field, if not more so, and more so than the incumbent.
Selfless...as far as I can tell, she’s the least likely to be staying in politics for the fun of it.
Win. Win. Win.
I love it when the left tells us how to vote. This joker KNOWS that a Mitt Romney nomination guarantees Obama four more years. THAT is his motivation here.
And by the way, I’m going to go way out on a limb and guess that this guy takes for granted that the incumbent passes the 3S test with flying colors. Which says more about his judgment than he probably wants you to know.