To: freepersunite
I thought you meant this Gary Johnson.
We could use another "actor" in the White House.
2 posted on
08/28/2009 7:24:04 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: freepersunite
Run, Gary run! I met him in 2000, thanked him for his stance & work on MJ legalization, along with everything he did for NM. We chatted for a while, and he went back to work. He was good for New Mexico. I would vote for him if he ran.
3 posted on
08/28/2009 7:24:28 PM PDT by
dware
(3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
To: freepersunite
Funny that the only "comparison" candidate mentioned is Sarah (no last name needed)...
"(H)e is personally pro-choice"..."He's also libertarian on drugs"...
BYE!
5 posted on
08/28/2009 7:29:40 PM PDT by
Longhair_and_Leather
(Don't send a boy to do a man's job, send a woman--Sarah 2012!)
To: freepersunite; LegendHasIt; Rogle; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; ...
9 posted on
08/28/2009 7:37:16 PM PDT by
CedarDave
(Will Rogers on Death & Taxes: "Death doesn't get worse every time Congress meets")
To: freepersunite
I had the pleasure of meeting Gov. Johnson at my brother’s graduation at TVI (now CNM). He strikes me as the real deal, and if he is really interested in running, I’m on board. He was a darn good governor in NM, as well.
With the possible exception of Palin (the jury’s still out on her, IMO) ALL of the other widely mentioned candidates are frankly about as inspiring as Bob Dull. Romney: Gun grabbing socialist Masshole RINO. Huckleberry: TV preacher socialist RINO. Jeb: Another Bush, no thanks. Rooty Toots: Fuhgeddaboutit! Graham: HAHAHAHA! Right. Crist: HAHAHAH! OMG, yer killin’ me!
The Repubs had better get someone out in front who has a pair, and right now the only contenders I see are Palin, and possibly Johnson right now. I DON’T want another Dole/Clinton election. Obamugabe must be stopped.
31 posted on
08/28/2009 8:10:19 PM PDT by
Mr. Rabbit
(Health care is NOT a right - It's an individual's personal responsibility.)
To: freepersunite
Ron Paul 2.0
(he can’t unite the conservatives, only splinter off the libertarians.)
To: freepersunite
Folks who have at their base the philosophy of non-aggression who are okie dokie with the utmost aggression against the weakest among us are confused at best and hypocritical clowns when not given the benefit of the doubt.
In either case I won't be voting for him or anybody like him. Dr Paul, who I disagree with vehmently on foreign policy, is at least consistent in his views. Governor Johnson? Not even close.
48 posted on
08/28/2009 8:49:11 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
(CommieCare: Need a Stent, Take a Red Pill. Next!)
To: freepersunite
He’s against the failed drug war? The drug warriors won’t like that.
53 posted on
08/28/2009 8:55:00 PM PDT by
mysterio
To: freepersunite
“...I believe in a woman’s ‘right to choose...’”
Pro-Abotion...
Candidacy DOA.
If the Republican’s screw up SO bad as to choose someone like this, they will forfeit any chance of regaining power...
55 posted on
08/28/2009 8:58:48 PM PDT by
patriot preacher
(To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
To: bamahead
69 posted on
08/28/2009 9:48:42 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Liberal sacred cows make great hamburger)
To: freepersunite
70 posted on
08/29/2009 12:45:04 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: freepersunite; pissant
Why support a pro-abortion RINO?
Hunter/Palin 2012!
72 posted on
08/29/2009 1:52:36 AM PDT by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: freepersunite
Pot users belong in prison not the white house!
73 posted on
08/29/2009 2:00:36 AM PDT by
dalereed
To: freepersunite
he says he is personally pro-choice So, what, he's willing to tear the babies apart limb from limb himself?
78 posted on
08/29/2009 4:25:35 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(You can have freedom. You can have socialism. But you can't have both! www.AIPNEWS.com)
To: freepersunite
Cutting all spending on Iraq and Afghanistan combined would take 10 years to equal a single Trillion. It is extremely intellectually dishonest to lump together all defense spending as "Spending on Iraq and Afghanistan".
FACTS matter, the FACT that you are so willing to simply IGNORE the facts to scream slogans about "Saving trillions" indicates you have utterly NO intellectual credibility and are merely a mindless propaganda bot.
85 posted on
08/29/2009 5:58:06 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(To all the senior citizens that voted for Hope and Change - heres yours-mom4melody)
To: freepersunite
Actually learn the facts and try again. Merely mindlessly re-posting your fraudulent talking points over and over does NOT magically change your propaganda to fact. Your mistake is you look at all the spending in the bills and assume it is for Iraq and Afganistan. NO it is not.
In fact, if you really want your guy to be taken seriously, have him come out and make priority one of his campaign forcing Congress to restrict appropriations bills to a single topic, not using defense bills as a dump basin for all spending wishes they have that they cannot get enough votes to get passed by the normal legislative process./p> Many state legislatures operate under this rule and it works just fine.
87 posted on
08/29/2009 6:16:25 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(To all the senior citizens that voted for Hope and Change - heres yours-mom4melody)
To: freepersunite
From what I’ve read about him, I would support him above everyone else in the field.
95 posted on
08/29/2009 3:50:23 PM PDT by
SoDak
(Molon Labe)
To: freepersunite
He’s running and I’m backing him.
105 posted on
08/30/2009 7:14:43 PM PDT by
elkfersupper
(Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: freepersunite
But But! I thought taxing and spending was good for the economy!!?? DATS WHAT THE LIB MEDIA SEZ!?
107 posted on
08/31/2009 6:40:06 AM PDT by
mainestategop
(MAINE: The way communism should be)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson