To: lpmorrow
I’d prefer Palin, but it’s Pawlenty. He’s satisfactory.
To: truthfreedom
Pawlenty wouldn’t convince me to vote for McQueeg
7 posted on
08/28/2008 5:47:46 PM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals? FREE LAZAMATAZ!)
To: truthfreedom
We need to get Palin experience for the run in 2012. Hillary figures Obama will lose. That is why she is magnanimous. She plans on being the candidate in 2012.
Palin needs to be something big in the new Administration. Something like Secretary of War. Oh wait, they changed the name...
;-o)
23 posted on
08/28/2008 6:25:40 PM PDT by
Frank Sheed
(Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
To: truthfreedom
Pawlenty looks weak to me. Passive. To me he looks like a doofus.
Palin looks good, Cantor looks good and Romney does too.
And I don't just mean their looks or appearance, but their strength or appearance of strength.
I want whomever is going to get the most votes to defeat that arrogant, narcissistic, commie, leftist, socialist, anti American phony and future traitor Barak Hussein Obambi.
29 posted on
08/28/2008 7:15:32 PM PDT by
garyhope
(It's world war IV, right here, right now courtesy of Islam. VRWC. TWP.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson