Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Good idea, IMO.
1 posted on 01/25/2008 5:21:28 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey, count me in. Can’t stand Huck and have boycotted Chuckie for years.


2 posted on 01/25/2008 5:24:08 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Easier to boycott the Universe than Chuck Norris.


3 posted on 01/25/2008 5:26:07 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The blog is http://boycottchucknorris.typepad.com/boycottchucknorris/


4 posted on 01/25/2008 5:29:41 PM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Doesn’t matter to me, one way or another. Chuck Norris may believe in his man Huck, but I do not, cannot, and will not.

The whole idea seems to be trying to punish Chuck Norris for exercising his constitutional right to express himself politically. Gee - I thought we believed in the first amendment, as conservatives.

I won’t purposefully boycott Chuck, but I will ignore his political advice.

Just my $.02.


5 posted on 01/25/2008 5:31:38 PM PST by MortMan (Have a pheasant plucking day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Some people need to get a life.


6 posted on 01/25/2008 5:37:37 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is just childish. This going after the people who DO endorsements, simply because you don’t like their candidates, really poisons the political landscape. If a public person has done something WRONG or ILLEGAL, then you go after them for it. But to attack a man’s livelyhood just because he likes a candidate you disapprove of is wrong.


7 posted on 01/25/2008 5:38:58 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
IMO, huck was/is a liberal’s wet dream, second only to the idea of McCain going 3rd party or joining hillary on her ticket.

The guy has zero chance to win, and has diluted a very large fraction of voters to join him in tilting at windmills.

I openly believe that Fred would be in this race were it not for Huck, but, in fact, that is the position that we have contributed to by electing RINOs to the party.

Rove was right. We will fall in line. - Just like the black vote stays on the Master’s plantation, when a real Conservative bows out, the supporters rush to a socialist RINO type, who they all believe has “the best chance” to defeat hillary.

Well, that proves Rove right, and loses the election to boot.

and then we will all sit around pointing fingers and saying, “how did it come to this?”

It came to this by doing exactly what we are doing, and the GOP is simply following the path of least resistance that they perceive will garner power.

Nothing was learned in 06.

9 posted on 01/25/2008 5:46:25 PM PST by bill1952 (The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s silly. It’s a free country, and if Chuck Norris truly thinks that Huckabee would be a good President, he has every right to say so, even if he is mistaken.


13 posted on 01/25/2008 6:24:44 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Darrel Ng needs to get a life.


14 posted on 01/25/2008 7:13:14 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Uh, no, thanx. I don’t waste my boycotts on stupid issues.


15 posted on 01/25/2008 7:14:52 PM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I DO NOT support Huck, but boycotting Chuck is silly.
16 posted on 01/25/2008 7:25:21 PM PST by chaos_5 (The Republic is doomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“’Boycott Chuck Norris’”

Isn’t that a little bit, well, childish?


17 posted on 01/25/2008 9:31:22 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

sorry I won’t boycott Norris, that is childish

He has been on the right side of politics his whole career in a community that eschews that.

so what if you don’t like his GOP preference....just let it go.


18 posted on 01/26/2008 10:01:19 AM PST by wardaddy (Political Correctness is to Western Culture what the Aids virus is to the cake community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is a free country and anyone can endorse anyone they wish. I personally like Chuck Norris, and think he’s misguided, but if everyone boycotted everyone who endorsed somebody we didn’t like or disagreed with, then no one would sell records or movies.


19 posted on 01/26/2008 12:56:51 PM PST by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know what’s gotten into to Chuck Norris. His endorsement of Huck is sad.


23 posted on 01/27/2008 11:26:53 AM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’ve been boycotting Chuck for over 30 years, he’s always been referred to as F*** Norris at my house. Nothing personal (at least until lately), I just abhor martial arts movies, I also call Jean-Claude Van Damme “Van Dammit”. However, Norris has gotten to the point lately where he reminds me of William Shatner...he’s just extremely annoying and an embarrassment to himself in public.
24 posted on 01/28/2008 8:04:24 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
As a Fred supporter I think this boycott is ridiculous. Mr. Ng is upset because he gave up a $110,280 job back in September to work for Fred. That's a risk one takes in politics, especially in the primaries.

It looks like Mr. Ng is not squeaky clean either:

In 2002, while serving as spokesman for California's outgoing Secretary of State's gubernatoral campaign, Ng was in the spotlight for another Internet campaign on behalf of his boss, Bill Jones. Despite the state's anti-spam law, the campaign sent out thousands of unsolicited e-mails urging California voters to vote for Jones in the upcoming primary. It was the third wave of what many considered spam by the campaign.

Ng defended the mailings, saying they weren't spam, but instead an "innovative way to use the Internet," reported Wired News.

Ng says his current innovative way of using the Internet won't stop until Chuck Norris is no longer affiliated with the view that evolution does not exist and the idea that AIDS patients should be isolated. Only then will he end his personal boycott and urge others to do the same.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59911

25 posted on 01/28/2008 10:43:50 AM PST by Proverbs 3-5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson