Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/06/2007 12:20:07 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Fred’s opposition to a Life and Marriage Amendment are two of the main reasons I can’t support him. If he gets the nomination, I would definitely vote for him over Hildabeast, though.


2 posted on 11/06/2007 12:44:02 AM PST by Pinkbell (Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Clinton and the libs are gonna eat this guy alive. That’s why they wrote that Harper article to give Fred a boost. Clinton wants Fred to win the GOP nomination.


4 posted on 11/06/2007 3:26:43 AM PST by Romneyfor President2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Howard Baker was saying this crap in 1980 we would SCREAM that he was a LYING ABORTIONIST!

Yet for some reason... blind desperation perhaps... Fred is getting way to wide of a pass on these issues...

= (


8 posted on 11/06/2007 12:51:34 PM PST by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Mitt Romney tried to say he was always pro-life. When he was called on it he admitted he had been pro-choice, but now he changed his position. Fred is trying to get away with what Mitt couldn’t. He says he 100% pro-life, he just doesn’t support the criminalization of abortion. That makes him pro-choice. The difference between Fred and Mitt is that Fred hasn’t changed his position at all. He’s still pro-choice.


13 posted on 11/07/2007 12:57:30 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson