To: JohnnyZ; TheRightGuy; BillyBoy; prairiebreeze; Rollee; Chi-townChief; unspun
Every Political Program I have seen the last 2 weeks that have talked about the Senate Races all over the nation have pegged the Democrats winning the Illinois Senate Seat.
Of course You are partial to Jack Ryan.
I THINK YOU ARE WRONG.
3 posted on
01/05/2004 2:17:11 AM PST by
chicagolady
(Jesus, Be my Magnificent Obsession)
To: chicagolady
Okay. Wrong about what? That Jack Ryan is leading the nomination chase? That he is the most desirable nominee? That McKenna is 2nd? That Oberweis has lost his establishment support? That a pro-draft, pro-abort like Borling is an undesirable nominee?
That the general election race is a tossup?
4 posted on
01/05/2004 3:06:49 PM PST by
JohnnyZ
(Abolish the food tax)
To: chicagolady; Pubbie
Right now it looks like it'll end up as:
1. Ryan: popular favorite (45%)
2. McKenna: establishment fave for insiders who think they're essential (22%)
3. Rauschenberger: respected but underfunded (16%)
4. Oberweis: prior primary loser called pro-lifers "Taliban", now claims pro-life, angering both sides (8%)
5. Borling: might break 5%
FIELD. Kathuria and company: less than 5%
5 posted on
01/05/2004 10:28:04 PM PST by
JohnnyZ
(Abolish the food tax)
To: chicagolady
Of course You are partial to Jack Ryan. I THINK YOU ARE WRONG. Hey Lady, were you ever planning on answering my questions? Or are you a cut-and-run poster? Just wondering . . .
11 posted on
01/13/2004 12:37:23 PM PST by
JohnnyZ
(This Week in Senate Races: David Beasley, Katherine Harris, Gary Hart, and Dan Blue DECIDE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson