Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I can't think of a single reason why this wouldn't be a suitable "extinquisher" for an orninary-sized nursing home room.

I am placing it here mainly for comment and to register the idea (date and time stamp).

If I am out of order, I apologize.

1 posted on 10/04/2003 8:03:18 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Flame warriors, unite!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


2 posted on 10/04/2003 8:05:25 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Old Professer
"orninary" should be ordinary, sorry.
3 posted on 10/04/2003 8:05:39 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Old Professer
connected to an 80Cubic Foot gas bottle charged to ~2300PSI

It should work, so long as the fire gets to the sprinkler head before it gets to this bomb.

4 posted on 10/04/2003 8:09:16 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (End Judicial Activism Now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Old Professer
Not much good if the building burns down around the room! How many of the deaths in Nashville were from smoke inhalation?
5 posted on 10/04/2003 8:15:26 PM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Old Professer
Water is used in conventional sprinkler systems because it is reasonably effective, but more importantly because large amounts of it can be delivered easily and cheaply. If the extinguishing agent isn't going to be supplied by mains, it may make sense to use something else as an extinguishing agent.

What would be the effect of using CO2 rather than air to pressurize the water? This would seem to have a number of advantages: (1) CO2 will liquify at IIRC about 1,000PSI allowing better density than air at 2,000PSI; (2) if the CO2 dissolves in the water, it would effervesce upon hitting the fire, acting as a useful additional extinguishing agent; (3) CO2 storage tanks are quite common in soda-fountain applications and may be cheaper than air storage tanks.

Otherwise, even if you don't like CO2, I'd suggest that pure water probably isn't the best extinguishing agent; some sort of foam (water-based or not) could probably do better. What would happen if you threw some dish detergent or other such stuff into the water tank?

8 posted on 10/04/2003 8:24:02 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Old Professer
Would this involve having 75 gallon water heater tanks, etc. for each individual room? How does one safeguard the common areas, eg, dining halls, hallways, restrooms, support facilities for the building?

21 posted on 10/04/2003 9:02:11 PM PDT by Chummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson