1 posted on
10/04/2003 5:00:07 PM PDT by
amordei
To: narses
Ping.
2 posted on
10/04/2003 5:02:12 PM PDT by
amordei
To: All
There's A Better Way To Beat The Media Clymers (And You Don't Have To Skate)!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
10/04/2003 5:03:14 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: amordei
No, because there is a viable pro-life alternative.
No votes for traitors against the Right To Life, not even for county Dog Catcher.
To: Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona
ping
To: amordei
Arnolds pro choice and a social liberal - supports the homosexual agenda. Most likely his wife nor he would ever have any parts of an abortion nor would either engage in a same sex relation. I call that cold hypocrisy.
You ask a question that extends beyond Catholicism. Instead it questions ones views on hypocrisy and voter common sense. A conservative person has NO business supporting Arnold.
9 posted on
10/04/2003 5:08:20 PM PDT by
nmh
To: amordei
Arnolds pro choice and a social liberal - supports the homosexual agenda. Most likely his wife nor he would ever have any parts of an abortion nor would either engage in a same sex relation. I call that cold hypocrisy.
You ask a question that extends beyond Catholicism. Instead it questions ones views on hypocrisy and voter common sense. A conservative person has NO business supporting Arnold.
Forgot to mention I am NOT a RC or a Catholic.
10 posted on
10/04/2003 5:08:53 PM PDT by
nmh
To: amordei
Thsoe past the practice stage will have no problem.
12 posted on
10/04/2003 5:09:20 PM PDT by
per loin
To: amordei
On more thing. Arnold and Maria both consider themselves Catholic. I don't know if it is RC. I do know the Catholic church is coming down on pro choice people regardless of their wealth and who they are maried to SO maybe at a later date your church may have some unkind words to Arnold with his pro choice and homo stance. OR will it be another hypocritical issue because of the Kennedy connection?
15 posted on
10/04/2003 5:11:00 PM PDT by
nmh
To: amordei
Can a practising Roman Catholic in good conscience vote for Arnold?Yeh. Go ahead. If they can accept sodomites in "clean conscience", they can accept anything. Go for it.
16 posted on
10/04/2003 5:11:07 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: amordei
Can a practising Roman Catholic in good conscience vote for other practicing Roman Catholics in good conscience?
Teddy Kennedy comes to mind?
24 posted on
10/04/2003 5:16:42 PM PDT by
lonestar
(Don't mess with Texans!)
To: amordei; BibChr
Wow - here for 3 years, 2 minor posts two years ago, and suddenly you're posting anti Schwarzeneggar screeds.
Talk about a sleeper account.
To: amordei
Well, the first thing you would have to sort out is what is more important to you. Are you more concerned with money or a person's moral fiber?
If all you care about is money, then you should feel no guilt in voting for Arnold.
If sucking the brains out of babies moments before they are born matters to you, then you may have a problem voting for a man that it doesn't bother.
If promoting sexual behavior that shortens one's life and at the same time helps spread an incurable disease,then you may have a problem voting for a man who doesn't see a problem with that sort of behavior.
I would pray on it. Let the Holy Spirit be your Guide.
To: amordei; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; ...
If he accepts the Church teaching on abortion and fights for life, yes. Until then, no.
29 posted on
10/04/2003 5:20:21 PM PDT by
narses
("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Cardinal Arinze of Nigeria)
To: amordei
I have been thinking about this in more general terms recently, not just in relation to Arnold and the recall.
FWIW, There is some good analysis of the question in the latest edition of First Things.
Here is my current opinion.
It is clearly disobedient, and even a sin, for a Catholic Statesman to hold in public, and to act according to the holding, that abortion is a "right" or tostand for "choice." Accordingly, Davis, Bustamente, and Arnold are all in direct disobedience to the practical teaching of their Faith. [not to mention Ted K. and a host of Democrats in the Congress]
It has been, and continues to be, a dereliction of duty, IMHO, for their Bishops not to confront them with this fact. Davis has, in fact, been confronted somewhat like this in Sacramento.
For Catholic citizens to support such Catholics in an open and public way seems to me grossly unacceptable. It causes scandal.
Voting is private. So the scandal is less. But in this country, the fundamental political thought is, from the Founding, that the People is sovereign. So, in a way, we are all statesmen. Hence, unless there is grave reason to do otherwise, no Catholic should even vote for a pro-abortion "rights" candidate.
I am 55 years old. Before I die, I believe I will see the Church take the stance I have sketched in an open and public way. I believe it is the spirit of its teaching even now.
Peace be with you!
Richard F.
30 posted on
10/04/2003 5:20:29 PM PDT by
rdf
(co-chair of "yes on 209", GOP chair, Vta County CA, '92)
To: amordei
Ask yourself these questions:
1) Why does Arnold want me to vote for him?
A)Is it because he wants to advance the causes that are near and dear to my heart?
B)Or is it because he wants me to help him advance the causes that are near and dear to his heart?
C)Which is more important to me? That which is near and dear to my heart or that which is near and dear to Arnold Schwarzenegger's heart?
Don't feel obligated to tell me how you answered these questions but if you want to, feel free.
To: amordei
Hypothetical: Let's assume that there was a Republican primary that was won by Arnold. In the subsequent election between Arnold and a Democratic candidate who would you vote for? Would voting for Arnold trouble you so much that you would not vote at all? Could you live with yourself if you voted for Arnold? Could you live with yourself if you didn't vote and the Democrat won? Answer these questions and you will know what to do on Tuesday.
To: amordei
This Catholic believes it is immoral to allow Gray Davis or Cruz Bustamante to be in power.
41 posted on
10/04/2003 5:28:58 PM PDT by
doug from upland
(Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
To: amordei
Man, you really started something. :)
To: amordei; BlackElk; Maximilian; Land of the Irish
No, a practicing Catholic cannot in good conscience vote for a pro-abort candidate when there is a pro-life candidate running. Davis, Cruz and Arnold are all pro-abort alleged Catholics. Tom McClintock is a Baptist. This Baptist adheres to Catholic teaching more so than the other three. In this instance, Catholics should vote for the Baptist.
I pinged some others who might know the answer to this question. Does voting for a pro-abort incur some sort of sin on the part of the voter? Can this be construed as facilitating abortion?
To: amordei
Vote for Arnold then seek absolution in the confessional afterward.
61 posted on
10/05/2003 1:05:07 AM PDT by
Rudder
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson