Replies

If this is slander, then please present to me proof (e.g. an old post, etc) where either of the two of you have overtly promoted: 1) Rearmament 2) A more robust or aggressive stance toward the PRC, Russia, Syria, Pakistan, DPRK and the like 3) Questioned the validity of the claimed liberalizations by the USSR 4) Expressed concern regarding the strategic military intent of other nation states. Show me.

You have pretty much claimed that both Poohbah and I are traitors or at the very least backing hostile nations to the detriment of the United States. The fact we do NOT agree with your view of the present geo-politicial situation seems to be the only proof you have shown.

Post your proof that either Poohbah or I are selling out this country, if you have any outside your delusional and paranoid ravings. If you have none, then retract your slanderous lies - or tany future claim will be reported as a personal attack via the abuse button.

You have serious accusations. YOU are required to PROVE them, not demand that Poohbah and I prove ourselves innocent. In this country, the burden of proof has been on the accuser, not the accusee. Unless, that is, you feel that should be changed as part of the "drastic measures" you adovcate on your profile page.

--

For the record, I have been in favor of maintaining and increasing military strength, including this thread on the SURTASS LFA system:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/779984/posts

Such a system would be very detrimental to the People's Liberation Army Navy, particularly its submarine fleet, don't you think?

If this is slander, then please present to me proof (e.g. an old post, etc) where either of the two of you have overtly promoted: 1) Rearmament 2) A more robust or aggressive stance toward the PRC, Russia, Syria, Pakistan, DPRK and the like 3) Questioned the validity of the claimed liberalizations by the USSR 4) Expressed concern regarding the strategic military intent of other nation states. Show me.

Ah, yes, in the world of belmont_mikhail_suslov, one must prove their innocence of treason--where treason is defined as "deviating from belmont_mikhail_suslov's official approved line."

I've already expressed my opinions on the challenges the US faces here. You may disagree with my assessment; however, I fail to see how disagreement with your opinion is, as you attempt to say, proof that I am not a loyal American.

You leveled the charge, good sir. Provide solid proof--not of mere disagreement with you and your stance, but of my ACTUALLY being on the side of a foreign power against the United States--which, BTW, is the Constitutional definition of treason.

Provide the proof that I am a traitor.

Put up.

Or shut up.