tpaine - State laws on murder must conform to our Constitution & BOR's, under the supremacy clause of Art VI.
exodus - The only violation of law that is defined by the Constitution is treason. Any other violation of law by an individual is the resopnsibility of the many States, or the People.
tpaine - The Constitution -- shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and ---- every state shall be bound thereby, -- Why would you want to fight against this basic principle?
exodus - Oh, I don't fight that at all, I believe in the Rule of Law. Show me the passage in the Constitution that defines murder.
tpaine - How can I show you something that doesn't exist?
However, state laws on murder must conform to the basic protections of our Constitution & BOR's, under the supremacy clause of Art VI: - The Constitution -- shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and ---- every state shall be bound thereby, -- Why would you want to fight against these constitutional principles ? *********************
Oh, I don't fight that at all, I believe in the Rule of Law.
Show me the passage of the Constitution that State laws on murder must conform to.
Fellas, - we're just repeating arguments & spinning our wheels..
The defining moment on this thread, imo, came when I asked:
-- Show your constitutional reasoning on how a pregnant woman can be sequestered and forced to term by the state.
Nothing in the Constitution prohibits the states from doing so or authorizes the federal government to prevent the states from doing so.
171 MrLeroy
Very bold statement. Goes against every basic principle of our constitution & BOR's..
***************************************
No one has even made an attempt to refute my comments on LeRoys admission that the abortion movement favors a 'states right' to sequestering women from conception to birth.. Telling..