To: exodus
But your idea of interference might be different than mine, thus 'rights' have no practical meaning when you proclaim them universal.
181 posted on
09/30/2003 1:47:31 PM PDT by
JohnGalt
(Attention Pseudocons: Wilsonianrepublic.com is still available)
To: JohnGalt
But your idea of interference might be different than mine, thus 'rights' have no practical meaning when you proclaim them universal. *********************
I do proclaim Rights to be universal, just as our Founders did; and interference means interference, it's meaning isn't a variable.
199 posted on
09/30/2003 2:37:21 PM PDT by
exodus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson