[MrLeRoy]

No more proof is needed as to the USSC's position.

The USSC's position is not identical to the Constitution.

You dont agree with the USSC on the issue. Post your constitutional proofs that a pregnant woman can be sequestered and forced to term by the state.

Nothing in the Constitution prohibits the states from doing so or authorizes the federal government to prevent the states from doing so.

[tpaine]

We've been arguing about that ~fact~ [the Constitution does indeed bar states from restricting or banning early term abortion] for years now. No more proof is needed as to the USSC's position.

The USSC's position is not identical to the Constitution.

That's your erronious opinion. They base the position on our BOR's.
You dont agree with the USSC on the issue.
Post your constitutional proofs that a pregnant woman can be sequestered and forced to term by the state.

Nothing in the Constitution prohibits the states from doing so or authorizes the federal government to prevent the states from doing so.

Very bold statement. Goes against every basic principle of our constitution & BOR's..
I suggest you read our 9th & 10th amendments as to states powers, and those delegated/retained by the people..