Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Area Woman Charged in Pitbull Attack
ABC Action News 6 ^ | 9-12 | ABC Action News 6

Posted on 09/12/2003 6:12:51 PM PDT by ambrose

Area Woman Charged in Pitbull Attack

NORRISTOWN, Pa. Sept. 12, 2003A woman was charged with recklessly endangering her neighbors after her two pit bulls roamed the block and allegedly trapped six people in their cars.

Click Here for more news on wpvi.com's menageria of Animals & Oddities.
LaCora S. Watkins, 25, of West Pottsgrove, waived her preliminary hearing and could stand trial on 10 misdemeanor counts of recklessly endangering other persons.

Police said they received a call the night of June 25 that two pit bulls had trapped six people inside their cars. An officer who responded to the scene wrote in a criminal complaint that police were "prepared to use deadly force against the dogs when they stopped about 20 feet from us."

The officers went around the neighborhood, searching for the owner of the dogs, before encountering Watkins and telling her that the pit bulls were a public danger.

The dogs were ultimately brought back inside Watkins' house, police said. She was also charged with a summary disorderly conduct offense for allegedly failing to cooperate with police questioning.

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2003

Back


TOPICS: Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: dogofpeace; graphic; peta; pitbull; pitbulls; theusualidiots; ususalidiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

"Pitbulls are Peaceful and Loving Dogs"'>

1 posted on 09/12/2003 6:12:52 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


"I am tired of this anti-pitbull garbage. They are sweet dogs, no more dangerous than a golden retriever!"

2 posted on 09/12/2003 6:15:33 PM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
People who do not control their animals and the animals
do damage should have their animals distroyed and should
face jail time.
3 posted on 09/12/2003 6:17:57 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (The difference between a taxidermist and a tax collector? The taxidermist takes only your skin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
ping
4 posted on 09/12/2003 6:25:04 PM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Yeah...Yeah...another hysterical statist demanding the govt save him...from something an irresponsible person does..

The same hyperbole and hysteria used by the anti handgun crowd down at the Brady bunch
....handguns are evil...no one should own them...then pictures of murdered children are shown in mutilated color

Dogs save more lives each year than they ever take...countless times pit bull rotties dobermans and shepherds find lost children keep intruders muggers burglars rapists out of peoples homes and cars...

Where is the fair and balanced report of how many lives are saved every day by loyal guard dogs...

Just this mutt faced hysteria day after day...where are the stories about evil bicycles and sexually active virus transmitters..or the child posionings and skateboard accidents...plenty of gore there as well...

Oh well if it bleeds it leads I guess...
5 posted on 09/12/2003 6:25:38 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Canine Conservatives.
6 posted on 09/12/2003 6:26:07 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy

Come pet the cute little puppy.

7 posted on 09/12/2003 6:36:30 PM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
No dog is a savage beast. . .unless he happens to belong to a savage beast..
Archdeacon Hudson Stuck...
8 posted on 09/12/2003 6:37:14 PM PDT by Califcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Califcon

"Pitbulls are no more dangerous than any other kind of dog! Why my neighbor's sister's cousin's bestfriend's nephew was once bit by a golden!"

9 posted on 09/12/2003 6:42:45 PM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Dogs save more lives each year than they ever take

I believe in breed profiling.

The "save" dogs are retrievers, collies, and shepherds.

The 'fighting breeds' should require a license - and ample insurance.

10 posted on 09/12/2003 6:48:51 PM PDT by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
should have their animals distroyed

Really? No other means.

How easily you part with life and play G-d.

11 posted on 09/12/2003 7:20:46 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
THat is a misconception. The breeds do have differences but the only time the dogs are dangerous is when they have not been given CLEAR guidance. In the absence of an Alpha male or female, the dog starts making its own decisions and lives by the rules of the animal kingdom rather than the human ones.
12 posted on 09/12/2003 7:23:40 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
If animals are out of control because their owners
do not take control of them at all times,
The animals are a hazard and the owners are scum.
13 posted on 09/12/2003 7:33:16 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (The difference between a taxidermist and a tax collector? The taxidermist takes only your skin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
the owners are scum. That is a bit to brad. If someone is a habitual offender, that person is a bad citizen and should be punisfed, serverly if warranted. I still do not think that qualifies to be called scum.

But the animals are, as you said, a hazard. You are an ethically challenged individual, my friend, if you see killing as the only way to deal with hazards, and if you so easily characterize people as scum.

I hope you are just having a bad day.

14 posted on 09/12/2003 7:41:14 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
"Really? No other means."

"How easily you part with life and play G-d. "

Yeah really. No other means. They're animals. Not human.

We have dominion,remember?

Mr. leave out the "o"in God.

Keep your "dogs' away from others or they will suffer the consequences.
15 posted on 09/12/2003 7:55:01 PM PDT by Jacvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jacvin
Yeah really. No other means. They're animals. Not human.

I happen to disagree. If you read having dominion as frivolous killing, it is you who is an animal.

16 posted on 09/12/2003 7:57:18 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
"You are an ethically challenged"

Why don't you just surf on over to PETA or ELF?

Do you opine over murdered unborn children the same way you do over savage dogs that attack humans?

How come I think you don't?


17 posted on 09/12/2003 7:59:01 PM PDT by Jacvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
"If you read having dominion as frivolous killing, it is you who is an animal."

Frivolous? Who said frivolous? The story said savge dogs kept humans trapped in their cars. That may be frivolous to you but it isn't to me.

Had I been in the car they would have been dead dogs pretty darn quick.

Animal rights do not trump my rights to live in peace and animal nuts do not get to define what is my appropriate level of peace.
18 posted on 09/12/2003 8:04:22 PM PDT by Jacvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jacvin
over savage dogs that attack humans?

Next time, before you write, read the post to which you are trying to respond.

You did and continue to put words in my mouth, and with every post you make less and less sense. Looks like you just want to fight. Well, I do not wrestle with children.

Have a good night.

19 posted on 09/12/2003 8:04:26 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
"prepared to use deadly force against the dogs when they stopped about 20 feet from us."

I suggest you read the article again. When police officers consider the use of deadly force I think any rational person would agree the animals involved are "savage".

What constitutes appropriate use of deadly force in your mind?

When they're teeth are already in my neck?

Animal nuts are all alike. They expect the rest of us to be mauled or maimed before we respond.

Not in this lifetime chief!

Please do cut and run.

You don't have a rational argument and I dislike embarrassing strangers.


20 posted on 09/12/2003 8:11:57 PM PDT by Jacvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson