Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Endeavor
Doing okay on the diet. It will be one week tomorrow. I drink Diet Coke, and allow myself only one a day due to the sodium in the phosphate in it. I am sort of used to drinking water all day, so I didn't need to make that change.

I got caught on the road today with the hungries. I stopped at McD's, ordered a cheeseburger and a bottle of water, AND eating utensils. I flipped the bun into the garbage and ate the cheese topped burger.

According to the Adkin's Book, strawberries and walnuts are very low carb. I picked some up today and look forward to sliced strawberries and walnuts on my salad at noon tomorrow.
82 posted on 09/08/2003 5:52:37 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (Mens sana in corpore sano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Iowa Granny
Gak.

Good luck with it..good job with losing your buns.

See'ya.
83 posted on 09/08/2003 6:34:04 PM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Iowa Granny
Thanks for the diet reminder IG, ugh.

Please excuse my testing view source test run. It will take lots of practice, I figure the more I stare at it the faster I'll come to understand what is going on.

This from the BestOF The Web is driving dims crazy, I watched alfranken have a near breakdown because the majority of us stoopid Americans actually believe that Saddam had his dirty little fingers in the 9/11 attacks. What must it be like to be so stoopid you have no idea you're stoopid? Bless their hearts.

Best of the Web Today


BY JAMES TARANTO
Monday, September 8, 2003 1:12 p.m. EDT

Somewhat Likely
Here's a Washington Post poll question guaranteed to drive the Angry Left mad:

How likely is it that Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the September 11 terrorist attacks?

Very likely
32%
Somewhat likely
37%
Not very likely
15%
Not likely at all
12%

The Post reports that 80% of Republicans, 67% of independents and 62% of Democrats answered "somewhat" or "very" likely. And the paper doesn't think much of this view, calling it an "apparently groundless belief" and interviewing an assortment of "experts" who, while acknowledging that President Bush has never actually asserted such a link, he has used devious mind-control techniques to fool Americans into believing it exists.

In truth, however, "somewhat likely" is the correct answer to the Post's question. The evidence pointing toward a link is far from conclusive, so "very likely" goes too far. But there is ample reason to treat Saddam as guilty until proven innocent. For one thing, he simply fits the profile: America-hating Muslim Arab male with a history of mass murder. And he's known to have had various connections with al Qaeda over the years.

Furthermore, as a February editorial in The Wall Street Journal noted, Saddam's state-controlled press used the first anniversary of the attacks as an opportunity to praise them. "September 11: Allah's Punishment," read the cover blurb on Baghdad al-Iqtisadi magazine. This doesn't prove that Saddam was involved, of course--but if O.J. Simpson had gone around in 1994 talking about how happy he was that his ex-wife were dead, his guilt would have been a reasonable conjecture.

BestoftheWeb

84 posted on 09/08/2003 9:22:13 PM PDT by BigWaveBetty (Lefties = Failuremongers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Iowa Granny
I'm on my way to the store to get a freezer full of Lean Cuisine. Or I guess I could just stop in at Office Max and buy several reams of paper. Yuk.
123 posted on 09/09/2003 2:17:09 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson