In other news today
a subpoena was served on Canopy Group in SCO vs. IBM. See the
docket (bottom of page) and see
Groklaw. Notice that the subpoena was issued to
Canopy, the parent holding company, and not SCO itself. Subpoenas are only issued when a judge feels it is warrented. IBM's attorneys must have made a compeilling argument to do so.
Also, what's with SCO's Stock today? Why does a stock that went up 5% in it's first hour today have almost no volume for the rest of the day? Must be some communist plot. :)
Or perhaps the street has started to notice the game SCO is playing and thinks IBM is going to win.
Pump 'em while you can, Darl. 
