Skip to comments.
(Vanity) - A Question About Teachers Unions
BSunday
Posted on 08/12/2003 8:33:53 AM PDT by BSunday
I am interested in possibly teaching when I retire from the military. Do you HAVE to join the union in order to teach?
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: faq; nea
1
posted on
08/12/2003 8:33:53 AM PDT
by
BSunday
To: BSunday
Depends on the state you will be teaching in. Thats the best answer I can give you.
2
posted on
08/12/2003 8:35:08 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: BSunday
May I sugest going to a private school. They are allowed to hire any one they choose. My old prep school had incredible teachers who had real world experience.
To: BSunday
Yeah if you are in a right to work state you have a lot more options...check out nrtw.org
link
4
posted on
08/12/2003 8:43:03 AM PDT
by
Drango
(Democratic fundraising....If PBS won't do it, who will?)
To: BSunday
Here in tidewater you are given a choice. Some of my freinds are teachers here in Chesapeake and are in a Union, they hate it, but the union helped them get much needed raises. The down side is that the Union also allows poor teachers to get tenure...
5
posted on
08/12/2003 9:26:38 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(I seem to be the source of gravity, everything seems to fall on me....)
To: msdrby
ping
6
posted on
08/12/2003 10:43:08 AM PDT
by
Prof Engineer
(I won't FReep at work, I won't FReep at work, I won't FReep at work, I won't FReep at work)
To: BSunday
There are pros and cons to belonging to a teachers' union. Don't join one until after you are hired, and then only after you have talked to co-teachers (at your school). Get all the information you can before making that decision.
7
posted on
08/12/2003 12:31:02 PM PDT
by
msdrby
(Go Navy!)
To: BSunday
All pretty much any kind of union will do is take part of your paycheck and give it to Democrat political candidates (except the share that is paid to the union bosses). It's a LOT of money.
In RTW states you don't have to join. In Oregon (not a RTW state), some government entities will allow a hire to not join the union, but they have to pay the equivalent to what union dues would be to some type of charity. I suppose a non-represented employee would be subject to the same benefits and restrictions as the represented ones get through collective bargaining, but would not get to vote on any of the arrangements, and would not receive any individual services from the union. The benefit would be not having those feelings of guilt knowing one had contributed to Democrat political campaigns.
No guarantee a person who thought this way would pass the litmus test and actually be hired, though.
8
posted on
08/12/2003 8:31:45 PM PDT
by
Clinging Bitterly
(Keep forgetting to update this thing from thread-specific taglines. Am I the only one?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson