Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: risk
Perhaps I was wrong about Gitai, but at least his argument holds no sway over my convictions.

In the classic Hollywood war film, great men lead others to seize the hill, take control, master the world. This is consistent with Americans' view of themselves as free agents, free to reinvent ourselves, free to remake the world in our image. In Gitai's film, everyone's fate is linked to everyone else's — and all are victims. Depicting war as chaos, he makes a powerful argument for peace. Gitai told Privett that he'd wanted to make this film for years but felt he could only after peace negotiations began, perhaps because he feared his sympathetic depiction of Israeli soldiers would have been taken as supporting the Israeli right; some of Gitai's earlier films were censored in Israel on the grounds that they were too pro-Arab. Here he's depicted what could be almost any war today. And by arguing that the characters' fates are intertwined and that no one is free to conquer the world, he not only links his characters to the Arabs, but all of us to one another. ---Fred Camper

8 posted on 07/12/2003 3:32:57 AM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: risk
I would like to see this movie. Was it easy to find in a video rental place?
9 posted on 07/12/2003 11:25:17 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson