[1smallVoice]

I am against a woman president for the same reason Bill Clinton was such a failure. He did not have the respect of the armed forces. Bush has that respect because he was a national gueard flyer and has gone out of his way to show respect for those who serve this country. Like Bill Clinton I doubt that any woman would have this respect.

[Buckeye Bomber]

I hope no one ever actually reads your post. There are so many offensive flaws in it, I'm shocked. To say all women would be as bad as Bill Clinton is to do a grave injustice to all the women of this country, especially the many women in our armed forces. If a woman decided to run in the near future and held the exact same views and qualifications as GW, why shouldn't she be elected?

The closest Ronald Reagan ever got to a war was he was once in a war movie. No one ever questioned his support for the armed services. Why would it be any different for a woman?