Couldn't resist. Look at the name!
1 posted on
06/14/2003 4:44:10 PM PDT by
Rollee
To: Rollee
Whack-a-mole is bad for moles.
2 posted on
06/14/2003 5:54:03 PM PDT by
gcruse
(Superstition is a mind in chains.)
To: Rollee
"rubber mallet killing "
Sounds like he did in some protected bird.
To: Rollee
You know I saw this on South Park ...."Sorry Kyle, I cannot let you tell" LOL
To: Rollee
This sort of case could be very interesting, though I doubt a jury will be able to really understand all the medical issues involved. I suspect it will boil down to who can come up with the better "expert witness" testimony.
On a related note, what are the exact rules with regard to injuries that at some point prove fatal? What about cases where an injury from long ago is aggravated by something that happens later?
As an example, suppose that someone assaults someone and causes them to lose a kidney. Twenty years later the person's other kidney fails and the person dies. Should the original assailant be held responsible for the person's death?
5 posted on
06/14/2003 9:56:35 PM PDT by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: mhking
I meant to send this to you earlier. "Hold my mallet" alert. Check out the perp's name: John Harry Nuckles!
7 posted on
06/14/2003 11:25:56 PM PDT by
Rollee
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
"Hold muh beer 'n watch this!" PING....
If you want on or off this list, please let me know!
8 posted on
06/15/2003 4:01:56 AM PDT by
mhking
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson