To: bvw; Tauzero; robnoel; kezekiel; ChadGore; Harley - Mississippi; Dukie; Matchett-PI; Moonman62; ...
No comment.
2 posted on
06/05/2003 9:04:49 AM PDT by
AdamSelene235
(Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
To: AdamSelene235
Good to see that they are starting to prepare themselves and get ahead of the curve on this one.
Richard W.
3 posted on
06/05/2003 9:10:41 AM PDT by
arete
(Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
To: AdamSelene235
This doesn't say what a "GSE" is, as far as I can tell. Also, why is this in chat?
4 posted on
06/05/2003 9:13:25 AM PDT by
bvw
To: AdamSelene235
If I understand it, it sounds awful Orwellian. Is this guy looking for the power to declare a GSE unviable without specifying what concerns he may now have or what basis restrict this power if and when he should want to invoke it.
Or am I missing the meaning entirely. It's not very clear.
7 posted on
06/05/2003 9:46:38 AM PDT by
Deuce
To: AdamSelene235
WTF is this doing in chat?!
GSE heading for receivership? - I'm shocked, shocked I say.
To: AdamSelene235; rohry; Wyatt's Torch; arete; meyer; DarkWaters; STONEWALLS; TigerLikesRooster; ...
"appoint a receiver to close and wind up the affairs of an enterprise that is not viable." As we say in Texas, someone is going tits up!
15 posted on
06/05/2003 12:36:45 PM PDT by
razorback-bert
(White Devils for Al-Sharpton 2004...Post 2 Texas Chapter)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson