All the talk is still about the Hildebeaste, looks like, between Rush and the local radio talkers. Of course, as most radio folk are part of the vast right wing conspiracy, they're all pointing out how much she lied. Once in a while, a pathetic pea-brained liberal will call in and say, "You're just jealous!" I don't know what they mean by that. One seemed to indicate the host might be jealous of Bill's success with the women, a laughable concept, at best. Just amazing.
Found another memoir boo-boo:
But two recent volumes -- our Post colleague Peter Baker's "The Breach" and former White House aide Sidney Blumenthal's "The Clinton Wars" -- appear to differ with Sen. Clinton's account of President Bill Clinton's shocking admission and its aftermath.[snip]
[Obligatory I gulped, I cried, etc.....]
But Baker reports that Clinton actually got the real story two days earlier, on the night of Aug. 13, from trusted attorney David Kendall. "And so it fell to him at that critical moment to play emissary from husband to wife, to disclose the most awful secret of any marriage," Baker writes on Page 24. "Something obviously had gone on between the president and Lewinsky, Kendall had told the first lady in his soft, understated way. The president was going to have to tell the grand jury about it. Only after Kendall laid the foundation did Clinton speak directly to his wife."
Last night, Kendall weighed in to contradict Baker's account, which Baker told us was based "on more than one authoritative source." Kendall told us: "Actually, I did not inform her of the Lewinsky matter. I believe the account in her book is accurate."
The morning after Kendall's visit to the first lady, the New York Times published a front-page story headlined: "President Weighs Admitting He Had Sexual Contacts." This was a full 24 hours before the morning of Sen. Clinton's playlet of revelation and betrayal in the first couple's bedroom.WashPost