To: Luis Gonzalez
Yeah there was something about the forties when a woman could be sexy without the graphic display of flesh they seem to need now-a-days. I also liked the hairstyles of the forties.
I think I saw all of Errol Flynn's Swashbucklers. He was one of my Mom's heartthrobs along with Tyrone Power.
1,029 posted on
05/30/2003 7:05:28 AM PDT by
SAMWolf
(Hummingbirds never remember the words to songs.)
To: SAMWolf
Yeah there was something about the forties when a woman could be sexy without the graphic display of flesh they seem to need now-a-days It's called "classy". Which is sexier than anything sleezy out there. To me, class & intelligence are the most attractive features of a man. ;o)
1,030 posted on
05/30/2003 7:25:24 AM PDT by
cherry_bomb88
(Leftists are NEVER attractive, no matter how much make up they wear!)
To: SAMWolf
"Yeah there was something about the forties when a woman could be sexy without the graphic display of flesh they seem to need now-a-days. I also liked the hairstyles of the forties. "
But back then didn't people think that what little flesh was bared were graphic displays? Maybe by the time my kids are teens the cycle will come full circle and it'll be cool to wear clothes again.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson