Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ValerieUSA
Gee, all that damage on an Airbus, and the tail didn't fall off?
684 posted on 05/27/2003 10:47:32 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
Gee, all that damage on an Airbus, and the tail didn't fall off?

They only fall off on perfectly clear days.

686 posted on 05/27/2003 12:08:21 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Gee, all that damage on an Airbus, and the tail didn't fall off?

Come on Nully, you're an engineer.
The trouble with early carbon fiber composites was inconsistency and unpredictable fatigue life.
I have never flown on any of the earl model Airbus planes for that reason. I also did my best to avoid the early production 737-200s for the same reason. I believe the Boeings have all had their small composite parts replaced with newer ones.

SO9

688 posted on 05/27/2003 12:59:00 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (Bilderbergers, adequate tools, nothing more. (Trust Me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson