Replies

Either one believes that the CEO of Fairchild Industries is lying or she's not.

Appeal to authority is not proof--but you even managed to get her background wrong. She WAS (note the past tense) head of R&D there.

She is now heading up an effort to ensure that America remains vulnerable to ballistic missile attack. She is NOT a friend of this republic or its citizens.

All we have is her word, without any verification--and she's demonstrated that she's perfectly willing to lie about ballistic missile defense to advance her agenda.

If she's not--then Werner was either lying or he was not.

And, conveniently, he's not around to ask if he actually said this--we stuck with Carol. Given her pre-existing credibility issue, she's not much to bank on.

Near his death, he had little motivation for lying about such matters.

You keep making ASSUMPTIONS, and then you treat them as ESTABLISHED FACT.

HE LOGICALLY WAS IN A POSITION TO KNOW about such plans of the puppet masters even back in 1970-1975.

You haven't demonstrated this, either.

I fail to understand what's so difficult about these basic facts.

They are not FACTS. They are ASSERTIONS from a woman who has an allergy to facts she doesn't like.

I suppose it's POSSIBLE that you could have some vested interest motivation in throwing cold water on such stories.

Quix, I really am very patient with you.

But if you EVER question my honor and integrity again, I will not be very f***ing patient at all.

Oh, I think you are above average patient with me given all the givens.

But to be as thorough as YOU ASSERT I NEED TO BE, one has to raise the issue and NOT ASSUME 100% too much about you, either. Isn't that necessary for complete intellectual honesty and integrity?

And while I'm happy that I believe you--your assertions aren't exactly proof either.

I agree that Dr Rosin is on the wrong side of what I feel is needed in terms of missile defense. I don't know about her lying about unpleasant facts in such matters.

I don't know about missing her CEO position accurately. It's been a long time since I looked at that. I could have easily mangled it in my memory.

I still say, your construction on the reality doesn't match my sense of Dr Von Braun NOR her psychologically. It would just not fit my reading of their personalities nor their motivations to believe your assumptions about them.

Thanks for your kind reply.