Please DO NOT post images of the infamous EW cover, or any Photoshop mockeries of it, in this thread.
There are certain Admin Moderators who can't handle it and will either delete your individual posts or move this entire thread into the chat ghetto where nobody will see it. It's not worth it.
1 posted on
04/25/2003 1:49:04 PM PDT by
Timesink
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Timesink
Wow. Snippy are we?
2 posted on
04/25/2003 1:53:56 PM PDT by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: Timesink
These people are idiots. They claimed last night that they are moral patriots and MOTHERS, yet they poise nude? Now that's rich!!
I pitty their poor kids. Can you imagine SEEING the front page of that magazine when you grow up? GROSSSSSSSSSSS
Sure, they probably used body doubles, but still.. the impression is left, so it won't matter if they try to tell their little ones,.."Well, that wasn't REALLY Mommy", because anyone with an iota of cognitive ability would still question WHY they would agree to "portray" themselves as being naked!!
These girls should have kept their mouths shut.. they are really disgusting. That is MY RIGHT to say. They helped MOLD MY opinion!!
To: Timesink
My tour bus driver left me high and dry a month before our tour started. I just couldn't believe he wouldn't drive my bus because of what Natalie said. That guy has more integrity in his little finger than these Chicks have in their bloated, pampered bodies.
5 posted on
04/25/2003 1:58:33 PM PDT by
wideawake
(Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: Timesink
If Bush was right here in front of me That's President Bush to you, b!tch.
6 posted on
04/25/2003 1:59:00 PM PDT by
TheBigB
(**FOX NEWS ALERT Lost puppy in Des Moines. Daschle "saddened." THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT**)
To: Timesink
They have an arrested maturity which predisposes them to a child-like view of the world. Which is consistent character flaw among Liberals.
8 posted on
04/25/2003 2:01:50 PM PDT by
Search4Truth
(When a man lies, he murders part of the world.)
To: Timesink
< They never in a million years thought that we wouldn't want to go to war. ... >
Therein lies the problem. Does anyone ever "want" to go to war? That's the problem I have with "anti-war" people. They seem to think people are "for" war or "want" war. What we "wanted" was to do the right thing. WAR was the means to get it done.
To: Timesink
Please DO NOT post images of the infamous EW cover, or any Photoshop mockeries of it, in this thread. Hey man, freedom of speech! </sarcasm off>
To: Timesink
I have to say the Dixie Chicks EW cover was more interesting than either the article or their interview with Diane Sawyer. Of course I don't think too many people remember what Lady Godiva was protesting either.
To: Timesink
16 posted on
04/25/2003 2:20:27 PM PDT by
Remedy
To: Timesink
I think that it's extremely "hilaries" that these folks with time on their hands (the ones doing the disc bashing) don't stop to think that they are actually supporting the Chicks. Somebody had to buy those CD's. Where the heck do these bozo's think they came from - someone stole them ??? All your useless protests are belong to us.
17 posted on
04/25/2003 2:21:33 PM PDT by
BSunday
To: Timesink; Registered
Hey, Registered -- Entertainment Weekly just screwed you:

20 posted on
04/25/2003 2:23:59 PM PDT by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
To: Timesink
I have a lot of questions that I would ask, and I wouldn't back down from those. But I wouldn't ask them with a lot of attitude. There's no hatred in my heart. Mebbe not...but there's a whole lotta stoopidity in her head.
To: Timesink
When interviewed, the terrrified Dixie Chicks, breathlessly told Dianne Sawyer, their fear of violence at the hands of those...gun nuts... you know those rabid convervative republicans. (sarcasm)
25 posted on
04/25/2003 2:30:05 PM PDT by
MaggieMay
(A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
To: Timesink; Registered
They stole registered's art! Those ba$tards!
27 posted on
04/25/2003 2:32:16 PM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(Now, let's go to the screen writer.....)
To: Timesink
After enduring the ABC program last night, my conclusion is that the Chicks aren't the brightest of stars. They really didn't apologize for insulting the President of the United States. They were sorry that they aren't being accepted by their fans for just being themselves and "speaking their mind". They are recognized as anti-American entertainers, however.
To: Timesink
As I said on another thread, these chicks just don't get it.
Most of their fans are conservatives who don't accept this sort of thing.
I predict that they'll end up, at best, a cult act with little fan base.
To: Timesink
travelin soldier is about something sad that happened to 2 young Americans during the vietnam war in rural America.
It sold because it painted a sad picture of Vietnam not a straight-down-the-middle picture. It sold because it appealed to the patriotism and reminiscence of conservative fans who support the President. But if they (the chiklets) say so, the song is worthless to me. And I feel like they tricked me.
36 posted on
04/25/2003 2:43:47 PM PDT by
muskogee
To: Timesink
It's not about the nakedness. It's that the clothes got in the way of the labels.Then, why did they talk to Diane Sawyer with their clothes on?
To: Timesink
Getting naked for a magazine cover shows just how far greed and common whores will go to keep it!I've seen better looking sl*ts than this drunk and lying in a gutter.
To: Timesink
I noticed that yesterday. I could not find any recent Dixie Chicks threads when I wanted to show some of the pics to some friends.
Whats up with the Admin Moderators?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson