The above sounds like an insult to me! However, if I was wrong in my statements, why did you not show where I am wrong as I did with your post? Maybe because my statements were correct??????? Maybe because as I argued in post# 37 Stove's article is dead on correct???????
Because there's no point. You'll never admit you are wrong, regardless of how firmly you are nailed to the wall - I might as well attempt to persuade rocks of this, for all the success I am likely to have with you. I am confident that anyone with even a moderate grasp of the English language can compare your posts to the article and quickly come to see that you have fundamentally misunderstood every point you try to "refute".