[gore3000]

It's the old "argument from consequences."

Seems to me that is the very argument that the evolutionists make. For after all what is 'natural selection' other than an argument from consequences? That is the central argument of evolution. Therefore, so if you want to defend your atheist theory, it seems to me that you need to take his argument seriously instead of dismiss it with rhetorical nonsense.

[Junior]

Then either you do not understand the concept of an argument from consequences, the theory of evolution, or both. Odds are, in light of your constantly making stupid or inane statements (remember the circle?) it is both.