To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
Whatever the evidence was, it was enough to set the 1989 definition of evolution as a change in allele frequency over time -- pretty much what it is now. That's alright, dear heart, at least you aren't dredging up stuff from decades ago as some creationists are wont to do.
204 posted on
02/12/2003 10:12:33 AM PST by
Junior
(The New World Order stole your tag line)
To: Junior; gore3000
Whatever the evidence was, it was enough to set the 1989 definition of evolution as a change in allele frequency over time -- pretty much what it is now. Another fine example of an evolutionist pretending to have evidence for something.
To: Junior
change in allele frequency over time -- pretty much what it is now.Change of allele frequency does not account for the creation of numerous genes, organs, abilities, functions, etc. since the first bacteria were around. This is the cowardly definition of evolution (for posting which you insulted me on post# 164). You clearly are shamelessly dancing around as I said you would. In post 200 you give one definition and here ONLY FOUR POSTS LATER you are giving another definite, true, and positively final definition of evolution. Do you think everyone that reads thesse threads is a moron and does not notice your dancing?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson