Heres a sat image of the SoCal fires. It updates every half hour.
Also Fox is live streaming coverage of the fires
Posted on 01/31/2003 5:07:21 PM PST by backhoe
Is Paris Burning? ( Religion of Peace® Alert )
Click the picture:
Europe's fear of Muslims increases
Glenn Beck: "Sick and tired of Muslims attacking Christians.)
(Video) Victim of DC Snipers Speaks Out
["americam" Muslims treason] Ohio No Stranger to Radical Islam
Hillary Clinton keeps having problems with donations from the Asian-American community. First her biggest bundler, Norman Hsu, turns out to be a convicted con man and the donations he bundled appear to have come from families whose modest incomes do not lend themselves to the large donations he claimed. Now another set of donors from similar communities appears to have been a front for other bagmen (via Power Line):
A search of Chinatown donors yesterday by The Post found several bogus addresses and some contributions that raised eyebrows.Shin K. Cheng is listed twice in federal records for giving $1,000 donations to Clinton's campaign on April 17.
But the address recorded on campaign reports is a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases, hemorrhoids and skin disease.
No one at the address knew of a Shin K. Cheng.
Another donation came from a Shih Kan Chang on Canal Street. But the address listed is a shop that sells knock-off watches and other pirated goods. The sales clerk there did not know the donor.
Hsiao Yen Wang, a cook in Chinatown, is listed as giving Clinton $1,000 on April 13. Contacted yesterday, she told The Post she had written a check.
But it was on behalf of a man named David Guo, president of the Fujian American Cuisine Council, and Wang told The Post that Guo had repaid her for the $1,000 contribution.
Such "straw donations" are strictly prohibited by federal law.
Knock-off watches. Pirated goods. Phony addresses. Straw donors.
What does that say about the Hillary Clinton campaign? Once could have been a mistake. Twice looks like a pattern. Taking into account 1996 and the same kinds of criminal activity in her husband's re-election effort, three times is a bad habit and not a mistake at all.
Nominating Clintons to the White House three times doesn't qualify as a mistake for Democrats, either. This demonstrates a lack of ethical oversight on the part of their party that reflects the kind of governance they represent. If Hillary wins the nomination after having her campaign conduct these kinds of criminal and ethical violations, then that tells Americans quite a bit about their threshold for corruption in pursuit of power.
And where does this money originate? Who wants Hillary elected so badly that they keep using Asian-Americans as straw donors to flood her coffers with their cash? Who has this much cash to dump into the presidential election? Perhaps the FBI will start looking for those answers -- and soon.
Needless to say, I regard the prospect of eight more years ( never fear a four-year Co-Presidency; the symbiotic Press will assure another four if Hillarrheah! is ever allowed to slither in to office... ) of nearly a decade more of this Hillbilly Clown Car Circus
"with great suspicion..."
Hattip: Winnie Ther Poo
Still, voters get- and deserve- the kind of government they vote for...
I'm not the first to follow The Lady MacBeth of Little Rock:
_________________
(Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin his way across the WWW
)
Looks like the GOP presidential candidates drank their Red Bull. Having one less person on stage (so long, Sen. Switchback) also helped. Recap here. And the best highlights were the one-liners against Hillary:
During the debate, the candidates took several opportunities to accost Sen. Hillary Clinton, either on her plan for health care, her late support for the Yankees baseball team and her proposed spending on a variety of issues, including last weeks budget amendment to earmark $1 million for a Woodstock music museum to commemorate the 1969 festival.
I wasnt there. Im sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event. I was tied up at the time, McCain said earning a standing ovation for the double entendre that referred to his imprisonment in a Vietnam prisoner of war camp.
Ive been very critical of her, but I want to tell her I agree with this one. Quote, Hillary Clinton, I have a million ideas; America cannot afford them all. Im not making it up. I am not making it up, Giuliani said to laughter. No kidding Hillary American cant afford you.
Speaking of claws coming out, the London Times had fun with the saga of Socks Clinton:
AS THE first pet of the Clinton era, Socks, the White House cat, allowed chilly Hillary Clinton to show a caring, maternal side as well as bringing joy to her daughter Chelsea. So where is Socks today?
Once the presidency was over, there was no room for Socks any more. After years of loyal service at the White House, the black and white cat was dumped on Betty Currie, Bill Clintons personal secretary, who also had an embarrassing clean-up role in the saga of his relationship with the intern Monica Lewinsky.
Some believe the abandoned pet could now come between Hillary Clinton and her ambition to return to the White House as Americas first woman president.
Clinton has been boosting her prospects in the past week with some homespun references to her gender as part of a series of events with the theme Women Changing America, during which she chatted girlfriend-to-girlfriend and mom-to-mom with female voters.
The softening of Clintons image seems to be working. Her chief strategist, Mark Penn, predicts that up to a quarter of Republican women will vote for her. She leads Democratic rivals in the polls by 26 points and is scooping up more donations to her war chest from Wall Street and defence contractors than any candidate from either party an unmistakable indicator of who they think will win in 2008.
Clintons treatment of Socks cuts to the heart of the questions about her candidacy. Is she too cold and calculating to win the presidency? Or does it signify political invincibility by showing she is willing to deploy every weapon to get what she wants?
In the annals of human evil, off-loading a pet is nowhere near the top of the list, writes Caitlin Flanagan in the current issue of The Atlantic magazine. But neither is it dead last, and it is especially galling when said pet has been deployed for years as an all-purpose character reference.
Another casualty of the Clinton machine.
***
Reader S.M. has a blast-from-the-past question: What happened to Kathleen Willeys cat?
While she is winning wide support in nationwide samples among Democrats in the race for their partys presidential nomination, half of likely voters nationwide said they would never vote for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows.
Sure, Zogby polls are always a bit suspect. But that result has been consistent all year long, and not just from Zogby. She has the highest name recognition of any candidate for POTUS, so its unlikely those numbers are going to shift dramatically.
STEPHEN GREEN IS LIVEBLOGGING THE REPUBLICAN DEBATE: I just turned on the TV, and Rudy seems to be doing better than usual.
UPDATE: "I was tied up at the time" -- good line from McCain. [LATER: Video here.]
Jon Henke emails that he's liveblogging at the FredFile. More on Fred here.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Okay, I haven't seen all of these debates, but it seemed to me that all the candidates were on their game to a much greater degree than they were in the earlier debates I watched. Practice pays, I guess.
But the best soundbite came from a member of Frank Luntz's focus group, who said about Hillary: "She's got a million ideas, and all of those ideas are something that America is not."
MORE: Stephen Green's sum-up: "Thompson exceeded expectations, I think, keeping him running. McCain had the best soundbites, Rudy had the best instincts, and Mitt turned out his worst performance to date."
And John Nolte was liveblogging too and observes: "Overall, I feel better about our field. Not thrilled, but better."
STILL MORE: Kit Seelye liveblogged it too, and also observed: "This debate makes it official: Its open season on Hillary Clinton."
And Allah has video highlights.
Harry Reid's favorability rating in Nevada is down to 32 percent, which is lower than President Bush's. 51 percent of Nevada voters rate Reid unfavorably, according to a poll by the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Sherman Frederick of the Review-Journal explains these numbers as follows:
No one can win a statewide race in Nevada on a platform that appears anti-military, anti-family, anti-marriage, anti-religion, anti-free speech, pro-illegal immigration, pro-abortion, and pro-taxation. While Harry isn't all of that personally, he clearly projects elements of them all when he's doing the bidding of his party on the national stage.
Reid isn't up for re-election until 2010. But it's clear that he has a lot of work to do between now and then, and that his current role as mouthpiece for an ultra-liberal, pro-defeat of America party isn't going to made his work easy.
JOHN adds: Harry Reid should be the Tom Daschle of 2010.
To comment on this post, go here.
Adding fuel to the firestorm set off by Lance, I give you this delicious vid. It's long, so settle in or view it when you have time ... but I guarantee it'll be worth it:
** Just a reminder ... F-bombs and name calling will be deleted. And, don't HOG the thread, take your essays to email. You know the rules.
Well, it's official. Bobby Jindal, an Indian-American who converted from Hinduism to Christianity in his teens, is the next Governor of the State of Louisiana. He wins outright - with 54% of the vote. The runner-up had 18%. Remember this the next time someone tries to claim that all Americans, Southerners, Republicans, etc. are racists.
Posted by Yoshi on October 20, 2007 at 11:15 PM
Permalink | Comments (17)
Steyn on Jean Cretien -- The Canada of 1945 was not outpaced abroad but systematically dismantled at home. Whether that was a smart move will be for posterity to decide
Huge and historic conservative victory in Switzerland
New Fear Leads Both Legal, Illegal Latinos To Leave Pr. William Co. (VA)-- So, this is bad- why?
SPITZER STEERING US TOWARD A CRASH: DEMS (illegals licensing portends Democrat election disasters)--Nothing like a big F.U. to the American electorate to seriously piss them off.
Feds outsource Mexican truck safety
No Backup if Atlanta's Faucets Run Dry -- Water relief for Atlanta -- is train system capable of RELAYING WATER to Atlanta/Georgia Georgia Officials Threaten to Sue Corp of Engineers Over Draining Reservoirs
From the comments:
Why Portugal is a haven for paedophiles - the disturbing backcloth to the Madeleine case
No Backup If Atlanta's Faucets Run Dry
The AP had space for "academics" to opine that we should start drinking processed sewage, but somehow failed to mention the billions of gallons being "consumed" by the endangered species. They also didn't have room to mention that the entire Georgia delegation has united to push for suspension of the Endangered Species Act:
Lawmakers propose lifting species protections in drought
While giving the Democrat former governor a soapbox to spout off about "millions" of gallons that he would have saved, the AP somehow didn't have room to mention the 22 billion gallons (118 days worth) wasted by the Corps in 2006:
Corps of Engineers "Loses" 22 Billion Gallons of Water
What Happens In Vegas Goes On Your Permanent Record does not have such a nice ring to it...
Bruce Henderson is live blogging. Be patient - unfortunately, there are lots of images of the fires to load.
Bruce Henderson is live blogging. Be patient - unfortunately, there are lots of images of the fires to load. Other updates at SOS Fire Blog. ...too bad the enviro-whackos refused to allow the forestry dept. to clear the forests of dead wood that suck up all the ground water and leave the standing trees in a state of "Disaster Waiting to Happen".
CW2 Ping.
Weve been using the expression Cold Civil War here on FR for at least four years, but its still nice for Steyn to notice.
Hrees a link I found in about two seconds to Cold Civil War, from 2003 on FR.
Reply #19: "I agree 100% with Prager, and I call the phase we are in "THE COLD CIVIL WAR.""
When politics at the national level is as tribal as some on the Left appear today we have the very real possibility of turning this "Cold" civil war into a "Hot" one. What we have here is a blatant abandonment of principle in favor of faction, politics in its most primitive, unthinking, tribal form. One of the things that makes it primitive is its proclivity for violence. We see this today in the identity of who gets shouted down on campus - left or right?
This is the Amazon link to the novel that Steyn refers to that uses "Cold Civil War."
Ive read about the alliance between Adolf Hitler and Muslim Arab leaders in World War II, and seen still photographs, but this is the first time Ive seen actual video of Hitler meeting with the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Muhammed Amin al-HusseiniYasser Arafats alleged uncle. From a German TV documentary, with English subtitles. (Hat tip: Justify This, who also created the Azzam Tamimi shrieking jihad video.)
Update 9:57pm Eastern. Heres a new video from the Horowitz Freedom Center on the violent oppression of women in Islam
Megan Sego at UC Berkeleys California Patriot is liveblogging the Nonie Darwish event tonight.
Update 3:30pm Eastern. A new purported bin Laden audio tape calls on jihadis to unite.
Update 2:10pm Eastern. Jim Hoft reports on the IFA week backlash.
***
The irrepressible David Horowitz is the man behind Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, which kicks off today. The Left and the jihadi apologists are in a snit, of course, and you already know what the grievance hoaxers at GWU attempted to do in their effort to deflect attention away from our true enemies and smear the organizers and supporters of IFAW.
The moonbats at Indymedia are calling on their minions to attack Davids campaign:
Horowitz means what he says, and its not at all an idle threat. Whats called for is nothing short of inflicting political defeat on them. In some ways, Horowitz has provided an opening for progressive and revolutionary-minded people to pry open and seriously change the terms of the whole debate, on campus and beyond. There is a basis for thisbut it will require a major leap in awareness, mobilization and determination.
People need to step back and look at the whole picture, the whole sweep of U.S. society and where it is heading. Students especially need to recognize what it would mean to have such a week go uncontested, to allow such forces to set the terms of discussion and political life, to have a genuinely fascist political program and ideology not just legitimized but widely promoted as the main trend on campuses.
Work needs to be done immediately to transform the campuses across the country. Horowitz and Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week need to be exposed for what they are, in diverse and creative ways. There need to be public forums and classroom discussions about Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week and the threat it poses. Campuses need to be saturated with posters. Those who are planning protests against the fascists, and defense of Womens Studies departments and Muslim student groups should be supported. The forces behind Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week need to be exposed and isolated. Other forces caught up in it need to be presented with the truth about Horowitz and what Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week is all about.
These people are not the champions of anything progressive. They are proven liars who are responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and laid that country to waste. They are readying a strike against Iran, which could include the use of nuclear weapons, as part of a global crusade which they say will last a generation. They engage in torture on an industrial, world-wide scale. They include biblical literalists who want to create a world which would be a horror for women, and for gays and lesbians.
Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week must be repudiated and politically defeated. Work needs to begin now with distributing materials, like this paper, that expose what this is really all about. When the week comes, people need to be informed and mobilized, ready to deal this fascist offensive a decisive political defeat. Horowitz needs to be thoroughly called out and identified as persona non grata, someone with no right whatsoever to try and impose his fascist vision on universities. At the end of Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, these fascists need to be defeated, deflated, discredited and sent packing. If this offensive is thrown back, their ability to launch further attacks on professors and on critical thinking and dissent will be undermined. The momentum of campus brownshirts could be reversed. A very different dynamic in the universities is possible.
The battle against Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week and the brownshirt offensive may be the crucible through which a new generation cuts its teeth and finds its place in history. All who want a better world should relish this fight.
The Muslim Student Association at Penn State is also up in arms:
The biggest fear among Muslim students, faculty, administrators, and community is that the event creates an environment of intolerance, fear, and prejudice. Faculty could be perceived by their students as fascists; students could view their colleagues as promoters of fascist agendas, and staff could be alienated by colleagues and superiors. Repercussions could lead to tension and divisiveness among students, hate crimes, and additional alienation of the Muslim community in general. Pennsylvania State University promotes diversity, equality, freedom of belief, and safety of its community. The said event compromises those values to say the least.
The MSA at the University of Washington wants people on campus to wear green to protest IFAW:
Hala Dillsi, a member of the UW Muslim Student Association, believes Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week promotes fear and intolerance. She is distributing green armbands and encouraging people to wear T-shirts that are green traditionally the color associated with Islam on Wednesday in solidarity with local Arabs and Muslims.
The student group also is organizing a forum Oct. 29 in which professors and local Muslims discuss and answer questions about Islam.
Members of the Muslim Student Association, along with other organizations, also plan to hold protests outside Wednesday and Thursday evenings Awareness Week events.
The MSA doth protest too much. No wonder they are so incensed.
Horowitz told the WashTimes:
Provoking protest is nothing new to Mr. Horowitz, an ex-Marxist and a leader of the 1960s New Left who has been the target of pie-throwing incidents during his campus appearances as a conservative speaker. He doesnt mince words when describing his former ideological comrades.
The left has only one strategy when dealing with its opponents, and thats to smear them, Mr. Horowitz, 68, says in a telephone interview. They learned from Stalin.
Mr. Horowitz says conservatives should not tolerate accusations of hate from left-wing activists.
Were not just going to sit and take it, he says. Were going to fight fire with fire. They are the haters, and were going to stick them with that.
Support IFA Week here.
The calendar:
Brown University
Robert Spencer 25th, 7pm, Salomon Hall 101
Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Greg Davis 24th, 7:30pm, Phillips Hall
Clemson University
Mike Adams 25th, 7pm, Hunter 100
Columbia University
David Horowitz 26th, 12pm, Lerner Cinema
panel with Phyllis Chesler, Ibn Warraq, and Christina Sommers 24th, 8pm, Math 203
DePaul University
Robert Spencer 22nd, 7pm, Cortalyou Commons
Dartmouth
Robert Spencer 26th, 7pm, Dartmouth Hall room 105
Emory University
David Horowitz 24th, 8pm, White Hall 208
Lawrence University
Jonathan Schanzer 24th, 7:30pm, Youngchild Hall
George Mason University
Luana Saghieh and Alan Nathan 22nd, 8:30pm, Johnson Center Cinema
George Washington University
Michael Ledeen and Daphne Patai 22nd, 10am, Mt. Vernon Campus, Eckles Auditorium
David Horowitz 25th, 8pm, Marvin Center
Penn State University
Rick Santorum 23rd, 8pm, 119 Osmond
Princeton
David Horowitz 16th, 8pm, McCosh 10
Pepperdine
Tammy Bruce 22nd, 7pm, Student Lounge
SFSU
Brian Sussman 24th, 12pm, Jack Adams Hall
Temple University
Rick Santorum 24th, 8pm, Student Center 218
Tufts
Daniel Pipes 24th, 7pm
Tulane University
Ann Coulter 22nd, 7pm, McAlister Auditorium
UC Berkeley
Nonie Darwish 22nd, 7pm, Evans Hall 10
UC Santa Barbara
Dennis Prager 25th, 7pm, Girvetz 1004
UCLA
Cyrus Nowrasteh 23rd, 6:30pm, Moore 100
Nonie Darwish 24th, 7pm, Haines 82
Joe Kaufman 25th, 7pm, Moore 100
University of Miami
Cyrus Nowrasteh 24th, 7pm, Whitten University Learning Center
University of Pennsylvania
Rick Santorum 24th, 5:30pm, Hillel-Steinhardt Hall
panel with Daniel Pipes, Dr. Stephen Gale, and Ed Turzanski 22nd, 7pm, Huntsman Hall
University of Rhode Island
Robert Spencer 24th, 7pm, Memorial Union Ballroom
University of Washington
Michael Medved 25th, 7pm, Smith 120
University of Wisconsin, Madison
David Horowitz 22nd, 7:30, Wisconsin Union Theater
USC
Ann Coulter 24th, 6pm, Annenberg School of Communication G26
I just worked my way through a couple of related links to a series of videos, depicting atrocities commited in the name of Islam and jihad. The titles are in German.
I have to tell you that Im a retired cop and I saw a lot of death during my 20 years on the job. And Ive watched the video footage of several beheadings that the Islamos love to post on the web. That is revolting enough for anyone.
But words are inadequate to to describe my revulsion and horror when I watched the public anal impaling on a stake of a man in Afghanistan who was accused of homosexuality. And the children stood by to applaud his agony as he was hoisted upright to die slowly."
A funny thing happens when left-wing social engineers begin to mess with other peoples' neighborhoods;
The Swiss People's Party, or SVP, which campaigned on an aggressively anti-immigrant ticket featuring posters that showed white sheep kicking a black sheep off the Swiss flag, received about 29 percent of the vote and 61 of the 200 seats in Parliament, projections showed, up from 27 percent and 55 seats in 2003. It was comfortably ahead of the Social Democratic Party, which dropped from 23 percent of the vote to 19 percent and was projected with 43 seats, as opposed to 52 in the most recent Parliament.
Opponents protested with riots and criticized the conservative party for instilling racist policies, but the electorate was apparently more impressed by federal statistics that showed about 70 percent of the prison population is non-Swiss.
And speaking of our objective watchdog media, here is another story about another European election from the Associated Press:
Anti-Immigrant Party Gains In Swiss Vote
Monday, October 22, 2007
GENEVA, Oct. 21 A Swiss nationalist party rode an anti-immigrant wave Sunday to the best showing of any party in parliamentary elections since World War I, while the Greens made gains by appealing to environmental concerns, according to projections.
In one of the most bitter political campaigns in memory in this usually tolerant Alpine nation, the Swiss Peoples Party called for a law to throw out entire immigrant families if a child violates national laws.
The party gained seven parliamentary seats in the 200-seat lower house of parliament, according to projections from experts for the state-owned SRG television and radio networks, which base forecasts on voting returns.
The party was expected to win 28.8 percent of the vote, or 62 seats in the lower house the largest share of seats any party has won since Switzerlands proportional voting system began in 1919.
The Green Party, which campaigned heavily on combating climate change, was projected to gain five seats in parliament. With about 9.6 percent of the vote, the Greens would have 19 seats.
The Social Democratic Party, the second-largest party, lost nine.
Switzerlands population of 7.5 million includes about 1.6 million foreigners, including many workers from southern Europe and refugees from the Balkan wars of the 1990s.
The Peoples Party claims that foreigners are responsible for much of the crime in the country.
Party posters featuring white sheep kicking out a black sheep sparked outrage blamed in part for a riot two weeks before the election a rare show of violence against a political party here.
The Peoples Party will now turn its attention to reducing crime, cutting taxes and keeping Switzerland out of the European Union, said its president, Ueli Maurer.
Im very happy, he said. The idea of E.U. accession should at last get out of everyones heads.
The Social Democrats, who focused their campaign on rejecting the Peoples Party proposal, won a projected 19.3 percent of the vote and fell back to 43 seats.
Switzerland, which has been losing glaciers in its beloved Alps to the melting effects of warmer weather in recent years, is particularly concerned about climate change.
Lets see.
An upstart very conservative, very anti-immigrant party won in a landslide unmatched in Swiss history, giving it 62 seats. The Green party gets less than 10% of the vote to perhaps gain five seats.
So of course the AP gives both outcomes equal weight. Though of course not equal reverence.
Compare the APs treatment of the Peoples Party:
In one of the most bitter political campaigns in memory in this usually tolerant Alpine nation, the Swiss Peoples Party called for a law to throw out entire immigrant families if a child violates national laws
To that of the Greens:
Switzerland, which has been losing glaciers in its beloved Alps to the melting effects of warmer weather in recent years, is particularly concerned about climate change.
What media bias?
But there is no certainly denying that many sensible people are concerned:
Naked volunteers pose for U.S. photographer Spencer Tunick on the ice-cold Swiss glacier of Aletsch near the mountain resort of Bettmeralp. Nearly 600 volunteers stripped before the camera on a melting Swiss glacier high in the Alps on Saturday as part of a publicity campaign to expose the impact of climate change..
Who can argue with logic like that?
By the way, note the conspicuous absence of black sheep.
From ABC News:
Rob Reiner Sings For Clinton
October 22, 2007
ABC News Eloise Harper reports: Rob Reiner sang a rousing rendition of Happy Birthday, Mrs. President in honor of Senator Hillary Clinton at his Brentwood, California, home on Sunday evening.
Celebrities came to see to see Clinton, D-N.Y., and to celebrate in advance of the former first ladys 60th birthday. Although they didnt bring gifts, celebrities from Jamie Lee Curtis, Magic Johnson, Ted Danson, Bridget Moynihan and Chelsea Handler raised a half a million dollars for the Clinton campaign and enjoyed cocktails and hors deouvres [sic] in return.
Despite the massive fires miles away in Malibu, guests were greeted by men dressed in head to toe white, with lavender bow ties saying with Welcome to the Reiners, as they shuffled up and down the street parking Bentleys, Porsches, and BMWs
This is a tough time right now and we need the best woman qualified, Reiner said.
Clinton thanked Steve Bing and other guests at the event before delivering her standard stump speech. About 250 people applauded as Clinton outlined her disapointment [sic] with the Bush administration.
Yet more aping of the JFK era by the trailer park Camelot set.
But still its not quite the same, is it?
And what, pray tell, is a Chelsea Handler?
Meanwhile, lest we forget this minor detail as noted in the all-seeing Wikipedia:
Happy Birthday to You
The company holding the copyright was purchased by Warner Chappell in 1990 for $15 million, with the value of Happy Birthday estimated at $5 million.
While the current copyright status of the song is unclear, Warner claims that unauthorized public performances of the song are technically illegal unless royalties are paid to them.
But did any of those Hollywood moguls worry about breaking the law and ripping off one of their own?
Of course not.
I thought we needed an illustration for the Clinton "Chinatown" fundraising scandals. In response to our request, David Lunde offers Ms. Hillary as Noah Cross.
Hillary Clinton's fundraising scandals have kept the blogosphere amused and certain pundits occupied, but the story has not moved much beyond the Los Angeles Times and the New York Post in the mainstream American media. However, the Washington Post editorial board has sent a small signal that her latest fundraising peccadilloes warrant more attention.
At Heading Right, I note that the editorial amounts to weak tea as scoldings go. However, its appearance alone demonstrates that these scandals may have developed some legs. Democrats concerned about her already-established negatives may have to consider the effect of having Hillary as a banner-carrier in a year when they have to defend their Congress from the party base and convince independents to join their coalition.
It is my belief ( some might style it "fear..." ) that America is hovering on the brink of being ungovernable...
Some food for thought:
Unlike "cyberspace" a quarter-century ago, the "cold civil war" is not some groovy paradigm for the day after tomorrow but a cheerless assessment of the here and now, too bleak for buzz.
CW2 Ping.
Weve been using the expression Cold Civil War here on FR for at least four years, but its still nice for Steyn to notice.
Herees a link I found in about two seconds to Cold Civil War, from 2003 on FR.
Reply #19: "I agree 100% with Prager, and I call the phase we are in "THE COLD CIVIL WAR.""
When politics at the national level is as tribal as some on the Left appear today we have the very real possibility of turning this "Cold" civil war into a "Hot" one. What we have here is a blatant abandonment of principle in favor of faction, politics in its most primitive, unthinking, tribal form. One of the things that makes it primitive is its proclivity for violence. We see this today in the identity of who gets shouted down on campus - left or right?
This is the Amazon link to the novel that Steyn refers to that uses "Cold Civil War."
A democracy is always temporary in nature--"Whether its a democracy or a republic or some combination of the two is irrelevant. The founders had the right idea. The franchise (right to vote) should be limited to property owners - or even better to taxpayers. This would minimize the effect of people voting themselves gifts from the public treasury.
On Wednesday, I understand, Harry Reid will seek to invoke cloture for the purpose of passing the latest version of the so-called Dream Act. This legislation, which has never been debated in committee, would authorize the Department of Homeland Security to cancel the removal of, or adjust to lawful permanent resident status, any alien who can demonstrate that he or she: (1) has maintained continuous presence in the United States for five years and was not yet 16 years old upon initial entry, but is no older than 30 years of age; (2) is of "good moral character" and is not inadmissible or deportable on certain criminal grounds or as a risk to national security; (3) and has been admitted to an institution of higher education, has attained a high school diploma, or has obtained a GED in the United States.
This is amnesty legislation. The group NumbersUSA estimates that it would grant amnesty to an estimated 1.4 million illegal aliens between the ages of 5 and 19 and several million illegal aliens between the ages of 20 and 30 [see below for more precise estimates]. It would also grant amnesty to the family members of those illegal aliens [actually, there is no formal grant - see below]. Moreover, this is no one-time amnesty grant. According to NumbersUSA, the legislation has no time limit. As such, it would undoubtedly serve to attract many more illegal minors and their families.
No amnesty of this sort should be considered until the government demonstrates that it can control our borders. Will Senator McCain adopt this view, or will he vote for a free-standing mass amnesty bill?
UPDATE: According to an analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies of the March 2007 Current Population Survey (CPS) collected by the Census Bureau, an estimated 800,000 illegal immigrants under age 17 have been here long enough to qualify for legalization under the Dream Act. There are an estimated 900,000 parents of these illegal aliens. It is unclear under the Dream Act whether the government would deport these parents. It is also unclear what would happen to the siblings of legalized illegals who are themselves illegal, but do not meet the Acts requirements. There are an estimated 500,000 of these siblings. The Dream Act also allows illegal aliens ages 18 to 29 to become legal if they arrived prior to age 16. The Center for Immigration Studies estimates that 1.3 million meet this requirement.
Thus, an estimated 2.1 million illegal immigrants would receive amnesty under the Dream Act, and an additional 1.4 million (estimated) parents and siblings might end up with de facto amnesty. Moreover, these estimates do not take into account the likelihood of fraud, which has plagued prior legalization programs. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, one fourth (700,000) of those legalized in the 1986 amnesty are estimated to have accomplished this fraudulently.
Fred Thompson has made his first foray into serious policy debate with an outline of his immigration plan. More a list of parameters than a plan, Thompson stakes out some hard-line turf in the Republican primaries, with plans for attriting out illegals through tough enforcement. He also wants to broaden legal immigration and put a rational system of management in place of the failing bureaucracy we have now:
1. No Amnesty. Do not provide legal status to illegal aliens. Amnesty undermines U.S. law and policy, rewards bad behavior, and is unfair to the millions of immigrants who follow the law and are awaiting legal entry into the United States. In some cases, those law-abiding and aspiring immigrants have been waiting for several years.2. Attrition through Enforcement. Reduce the number of illegal aliens through increased enforcement against unauthorized alien workers and their employers. Without illegal employment opportunities available, fewer illegal aliens will attempt to enter the country, and many of those illegally in the country now likely will return home. Self-deportation can also be maximized by stepping up the enforcement levels of other existing immigration laws. This course of action offers a reasonable alternative to the false choices currently proposed to deal with the 12 million or more aliens already in the U.S. illegally: either arrest and deport them all, or give them all amnesty. Attrition through enforcement is a more reasonable and achievable solution, but this approach requires additional resources for enforcement and border security ...
4. Reduce the Jobs Incentive. Ensure employee verification by requiring that all U.S. employers use the Department of Homeland Security's electronic database (the E-Verify system) to confirm that a prospective employee is authorized to work in the U.S. Now that the technology is proven, provide sufficient resources to make the system as thorough, fast, accurate, and easy-to-use as possible.
5. Bolster Border Security. Finish building the 854-mile wall along the border by 2010 as required by 8 USC 1103. Extend the wall beyond that as appropriate and deploy new technologies and additional resources to enhance detection and rapid apprehension along our borders by 2012.
This is basically the Duncan Hunter position, which relies on border security and tough enforcement of existing laws. That applies to the illegal immigrants themselves as well as the companies that hire them. Fred wants to eliminate the "magnets" that draw illegals to the US -- relatively easy border crossings, jobs, and sanctuary cities.
Most Republicans will like this plan, although it hasn't done Hunter much good so far. It doesn't get as punitive as Tom Tancredo, at least not in tone, and it addresses the issue with rationality, at least in part. The inclusion of immigration-process reform shows that Fred has not given in to the nativist impulse and understands that we need to speak at least as much about opportunity as we do about enforcement.
However, some problems exist with this plan, not least of which the notion of attrition solving our current problems. Attrition will take years, perhaps decades, and will not drive the truly worrisome people from our midst. Normalization of some variety would allow us to quickly achieve transparency for the vast majority of illegals in the US, which would also then allow us to seek out those who might have designs against the security of the nation. We cannot possibly make poverty here less attractive than the reality of poverty elsewhere, and the notion that 12-20 million people will simply walk back across a newly-secured border after being here for years seems rather fantastic. Many will, but many more will not, and we will still be left with an enforcement problem that outstrips our ability to solve it.
Still, as a plan, it exceeds most of what has been produced in this primary season. It shows that Fred has been listening to the party on immigration instead of dictating solutions to the voters.
I've documented the depredations of this ghastly woman
( and FWIW, I always regarded her as the worse side of "the two for one Presidency..." ) until I was blue in the face- click the Pix, scroll back, to see the latest fundraising scandals, and much, much more:
Needless to say, I regard the prospect of eight more years ( never fear a four-year Co-Presidency; the symbiotic Press will assure another four if Hillarrheah! is ever allowed to slither in to office... ) of nearly a decade more of this Hillbilly Clown Car Circus
"with great suspicion..."
Hattip: Winnie Ther Poo
Still, voters get- and deserve- the kind of government they vote for...
I'm not the first to follow The Lady MacBeth of Little Rock:
Hillary Clinton Faces a Viral-Video 'Truth-Boating'
Hmm: Chinese Dishwashers Gave Clinton Thousands
After the fundraising scandals of President Bill Clintons 1996 reelection campaign, the dangers of vacuuming cash from a politically inexperienced immigrant community should have been obvious. But Ms. Clintons money machine seized on a new source of cash in Chinatown and environs. As the Times reported, a single Chinatown fundraiser in April brought in $380,000. By contrast, 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kerry raised $24,000 from Chinatown in the course of his entire campaign.Oh, it starts off very, very well. But by the end of the story, the Washington Post demonstrated its editorial-by-committee policy and allows Hillary to play the race card: The alternative, the campaign says, would be to prevent those with foreign-sounding names from participating in the political process.
Foreign names like "Charlie Trie", a Chinese busboy from Little Rock;
[...] able to tap into millions of Peoples Republic of China dollars for Clintons defense fund and even brought in a major Chinese arms dealer, Wang Jun, as a guest to the White House. Only four days before Wang Juns White House visit, the Clinton Administration granted an import permit for a Chinese military front company, Poly Technologies, to allow them to import over 100,000 semi-automatic weapons and millions of rounds of ammunition to a Detroit company, China Jiang An. China Jiang An also had close ties to the Chinese military.
More - Somebodys trying to keep Hillary from winning the nomination. And it's not a Republican.
Clinton Says She'd Give Up Some Powers
HILLARY! UNCENSORED to debut at Harvard, Oct. 26, 8pm on Hillary's birthday!
THE HILLARY CLINTON FILE ON RUDY GIULIANI
BlogWarZ expands:
It is most unfortunate when a group of Islamic thugs get inspiration from LGF. I never thought I would see the day that CAIR and Charles over at Little Green Footballs would be aligned against a counter jihad movement but perhaps pigs do fly.
CAIR released this statement regarding the Brussels Counter Jihad summit which sounds like it took its talking points from Charles' post here.
I previously wrote that it was utterly wrong to dismiss this incredible effort, an enormous undertaking by so many brave fighters and truth tellers , so casually and so out of hand. I attended that summit. As did many other global bloggers, activists, and freedom fighters in a vain attempt to formulate strategy to fight the scrouge of the Islamization of Europe. Many came at great personal risk to themselves and their family.
I have enormous respect for Charles and came to blogging because of LGF. His news site gave me and thousands like me hope after 9/11. He is a crusader against radical Islam. An invaluable resource for news on the global jihad.
I assure you there was no neo nothing going on there. Charles painted this herculean effort with one ugly brush and took everyone and everything down with it. The irony is the one thing that we came away with, the thing we must do and do now, in order to effect any change , is EDUCATE. And look at the education we are getting. Political correctness run amok.
This conference deserved international coverage. I am not surprised that the mainstream media wouldn't touch it, they are deathly afraid of anything remotely tinged with Islam. They won't even call terror terror. But the alternative media? WTF?
And as far as the racist label (which anyone who dares to question Islam is called) - I don't consider this racism. The EU elites maybe but not me.
Robert Spencer is main speaker for upcoming Islamophobic campus tour
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) revealed today that the main speaker for an upcoming series of "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" lectures at university campuses nationwide recently offered a keynote address at a European gathering that included representatives of racist or "neo-Nazi" political parties.Author Robert Spencer, who is scheduled to appear beginning next week at universities such as Brown, DePaul and Dartmouth, is regarded by American Muslims as one of the nation's worst Islamophobes. His virulently anti-Islam website promotes the idea that life for Muslims in the West should be made so difficult that they will leave.
Spencer recently spoke at a so-called "Counterjihad Brussels 2007" conference in Belgiumattended by those with links to far-right parties such as Filip Dewinter of Vlaams Belang (Belgium) and Ted Ekeroth of Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden). Both parties have been accused of either having a racist platform, a neo-Nazi past or having links to neo-Nazis and other racists.
Vlaams Belang is the successor to the Vlaams Blok party, which was banned in 2004 for being an illegal racist political faction. (Vlaams Belang's founders were Nazi collaborators in World War II.)
Who the hell wasn't a nazi collaborator in Europe? Puhleeeeeze.
UPDATE: Conservative Swede weighs in;
..... we should focus on our mortal enemy, but it's also important to know who are with us and who are not. CAIR's core message is no different from that of Charles of LGF, it's just got the volume turned up.
I'm not surprised at this development at all, these are the mechanisms of political correctness. LGF is no different from Sweden here. As is illustrated by my concept "The Finish of the West", the reason why Western people end up on the same side as CAIR (etc.) like this, is not their wish to destroy the West. On the contrary, it's driven by: i) their wish to perfecting goodness, ii) fear of ghosts. Liberals do not went to destroy the West, their aim is in perfecting goodness. Same with the leftists, only a few avant-gardists actually want to destroy the West, the big majority are just working hard in perfecting goodness. The only difference between the left-wing and the right-wing, is that the right-wing has realized that goodness cannot be just that perfected. For the right-wing the fear-of-ghosts component is therefore more active, but both components are active in both camps.
Sweden, which I know well, is a perfect case study of political correctness. As Edmund Burke said "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." And there are a lot of good people in Sweden, many in Moderaterna, the party of Reinfeldt, who see the problems but are completely paralysed by their fear of ghosts. The PC system is a maze, full of smoke an mirrors, which got most people caught in it. Few people see through the smoke and mirrors, and manage to find their way to the exit. But for these few who find an exit, each exit is guarded by a Nazi troll, fake or real. This is enough for decent people to back off and stay paralysed, while joining in the ostracism of anyone fulfilling his dream, escaping through the exit.
There's no difference between these decent and good people of Sweden, and Charles of LGF. And both cases illustrate how the PC tyranny is ultimately held up by fear. People will say that Charles is a good guy and fight Islamism, but so does George Bush, doesn't he? I'm sure Charles does good things for America, but when it comes to Europe he's effectively opposing resistance to Islamization. He's decided that the PC mazes of European countries, such as Belgium and Sweden, are best kept as perfectly sealed systems, and thereby effectively support the PC tyranny. So as Fjordman put in in the LGF comments section, either we are surrender monkeys or we are neo-Nazis. If we would take our cues from Charles and LGF the only option is to lie down and die.
As the commenter at Atlasshrugs wrote: "i think charles and little green footballs at least owe the rest of us some sort of explanation why they do not feel this conference in brussels worthy of a more extended coverage and comment."
Charles did not only avoid covering our conference, he struck a decivive blow against it. Of course all out of goodness and decency... and fear of ghosts. And these ripples have now reached CAIR. All unintentionally by Charles of course, this is not in his control, he's just a pawn in the all-encompassing PC system.
We who were at the conference know that THIS IS IT. Charles will have to decide if he's going to be with us, or stay on the wrong side.
UPDATE: Paul Belien of the Brussels Journal sent Spencer this information:
It is simply not true that "Vlaams Belang's founders were Nazi collaborators in WW II."
Vlaams Belang founder Filip Dewinter was born in 1962 in a family that cannot be accused of Nazi sympathies. His father and uncle were members of the anti-German Resistance. Vlaams Belang was founded in 2004, sixty years after the end of WW II.
The Vlaams Blok, predecessor to the Vlaams Belang, was founded in 1977 by Karel Dillen (1925-2007). Mr Dillen came from a non-political background. His father, an Antwerp labourer, abandoned his wife and their two sons when when Dillen was still a baby. He was raised by his mother. Neither he, nor his brother nor his mother were involved in any political activities at all during the war, let alone that they belonged to pro-Nazi and collaborationist groups.
UPDATE: Robert Spencer responds to CAIR. Please go and read it all.
CAIR hits a new low of defamation
The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has never cared much for the truth when speaking about me. The organization's spokesman, Ibrahim Hooper, has defamed me on national television, and the organization's website even featured a link, for a time, to a tissue of lies penned by a pathetic convicted felon.
But now CAIR has reached a new low, in a press release entitled, "'Islamo-Fascism' Week Speaker Meets With European 'Neo-Nazis.'"
WASHINGTON, Oct. 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) revealed today that the main speaker for an upcoming series of "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" lectures at university campuses nationwide recently offered a keynote address at a European gathering that included representatives of racist or "neo-Nazi" political parties.
The gathering was organized by American bloggers. It was about the Islamization of Europe. I had no hand in the selection of attendees, and was meeting most of them for the first time. No racist or neo-Nazi themes were discussed. If any of the people there are actually racists or neo-Nazis, I completely disavow them and all racist and neo-Nazi ideas. Now: will CAIR do the same thing regarding Hamas?
What's more, the real neo-Nazis of the Aryan Nations have said: "Islam is our ally, and the 1500 cults all claiming to be 'Christian' are our opposition."
Author Robert Spencer, who is scheduled to appear beginning next week at universities such as Brown, DePaul and Dartmouth, is regarded by American Muslims as one of the nation's worst Islamophobes. His virulently anti-Islam website promotes the idea that life for Muslims in the West should be made so difficult that they will leave.
Here again, there would be no "Islamophobes" if there were no Islamic jihad terrorism. The whole concept of "Islamophobia" is designed to divert attention away from Islamic terrorism and onto those who resist it. And we do not actually promote the idea that life will be made so difficult for Muslims that they will leave. In reality, I have consistently asked that American Muslim advocacy groups like CAIR help implement comprehensive programs in American mosques and Islamic schools to teach against the jihad ideology and Islamic supremacism, and that they renounce now and for the future, in deed as well as word, any intention to impose Sharia here. Why is that too much to ask? Why does that make me an "Islamophobe"?
Spencer recently spoke at a so-called "Counterjihad Brussels 2007" conference in Belgium attended by those with links to far-right parties such as Filip Dewinter of Vlaams Belang (Belgium) and Ted Ekeroth of Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden). Both parties have been accused of either having a racist platform, a neo-Nazi past or having links to neo-Nazis and other racists....
I know very little about Dewinter and virtually nothing about Ekeroth, and I am not going to be held responsible for all the ideas and associations of people with whom I shared a platform, any more than they should be held responsible for mine. It is noteworthy that the New York Times, in a profile of Dewinter, found no grounds to call him a neo-Nazi, which they surely would have if they could have. It is also perhaps worth noting that his father was in the anti-Nazi resistance. But ultimately, I said it all above: if there were any actual neo-Nazis there, I disavow them, and ask CAIR likewise to disavow the terrorists of Hamas.
Later on they quote Hugh Fitzgerald (why the quotation marks around his name?):
Robert Spencer's Jihad Watch Board Vice President "Hugh Fitzgerald" wrote on that hate site: "Only one group, only one belief-system, distinguishes itself by appearing incapable of fitting in. And that is Muslims, and Islam ... if one really knew what Islam contained ... then how could any decent person remain a Muslim?"
"Only one group, only one belief-system, distinguishes itself by appearing incapable of fitting in." Right. That's why there was a "Muslim Accommodations Task Force" (that was an MSA initiative; they're doing their best to erase all traces of it, but it's still mentioned on this Google Cached page).
UPDATE: It takes on a life of its own.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/findyourreps.xpd
Media myths about the Jena 6 (A local journalist tells the story you haven't heard)--There's just one problem: The media got most of the basics wrong. In fact, I have never before witnessed such a disgrace in professional journalism. Myths replaced facts, and journalists abdicated their solemn duty to investigate every claim because they were seduced by a powerfully appealing but false narrative of racial injustice.
A ROUNDUP ON fighting the Southern California fires.
And here's a huge fire-coverage aggregator courtesy of N.Z. Bear's Kithbridge company.
ADVICE FOR THE G.O.P., from Bill Quick. "The two hottest issues in the country - the war on terror and immigration - favor the GOP - if the Grand Old Party has the cojones to takes these issues and ride them to victory." You think?
Meanwhile, James Joyner reminds Republicans that hating Hillary is not enough. Kevin Drum disagrees ...James Joyner agrees with Dave Weigel that Republicans need to do more than haul out the Hillary Clinton boogey man if they want to win next November:
Hillary is political Viagra for Republicans . . . "Arousing the Republican base since 1992 . . ."
'Capt. Ed, this is one of the best pieces you've done. Excellent.
The only thing I would change is the title. I would have entitled it, " Two Anniversaries To Always Remember."'
Today marks two significant anniversaries in American politics. Rick Moran notes that a Mercedes truck drove in front of the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut twenty-four years ago today and gave the Islamists an eventual victory in our retreat from the peacekeeping mission in Lebanon:
When the bomb detonated, it may have been the largest non-nuclear explosion in history up to that time (we used the Daisy Cutter in Afghanistan which weighs 15,000 lbs). The entire barracks building was lifted off its foundation and when it came down, it collapsed in a heap of cinder blocks, plaster, and dust. A few seconds after the blast, another suicide truck bomber crashed into the French military headquarters detonating a similar device. All told, 241 Americans lost their lives in the blast. Another 58 French paratroopers died in the other attack that day. It was the worst day for the Marines since the battle of Iwo Jima and the worst day for the US military since the first day of the Tet Offensive in Viet Nam.While it is not a rock solid certainty that Hizbullah, acting on direct orders from Iran, was behind the attacks, the preponderance of evidence certainly points that way. At the time, Hizbullah was in its initial stages of formation, being trained by Revolutionary Guard units who had infiltrated Lebanon through Syria. At first, Hizbullah was not an independent actor in Lebanon, receiving its orders directly from Khomeneis Iran. The US had just given Sadaam Hussein more than two billion dollars in aid to fight Iran and the thinking is that Khomenei wanted to get back at the US for our support of Iraq. When US forces pulled out the following February, it was simply gravy from the Iranian point of view.
So for 24 years, we have been in an undeclared war with Hizbullah and, by extension, Iran. Or, at least Iran has been at war with us. We have pretended that no such conflict exists under successive US presidents, Republican and Democratic, liberal and conservative. Occasionally, history intervenes and tries to rouse us out of this stupor but so far, to no avail. In 1984, Hizbullah attacked our embassy, killing 5 Americans. In 1985, TWA flight 847 was hijacked by Hizbullah and a Navy diver was savagely beaten to death. They kidnapped and murdered CIA officer William Buckley and Colonel William Higgins, a Marine serving with the UN at the time. (They were kind enough to forward videos of the murders to our government). They fired on oil tankers in the Persian Gulf. They have operated around the world, killing Jews wherever theres a soft enough target to hit.
Twenty-four years of unacknowledged war against the US, and it started in earnest on this day.
The second anniversary also resonates to this day as well. Twenty years ago today, the Senate rejected the nomination of Judge Robert Bork, 58-42. Gary McDowell calls it a war for the Constitution in today's Wall Street Journal:
Twenty years ago today the United States Senate voted to reject President Reagan's nomination of Judge Robert H. Bork to the Supreme Court. The senators may have had every reason to believe that was the end of the story. However ugly it had been, however much time it had taken, Mr. Bork's defeat was only one more routine sacrifice to partisan politics. But time would prove wrong anyone who actually thought that. Mr. Bork was politically transformative, its constitutional lessons enduring.To many at the time (and still today) it was inconceivable that a man of Mr. Bork's professional accomplishments and personal character could be found unacceptable for a seat on the Court. Warren Burger summed it up for many when he described Mr. Bork as simply the best qualified nominee in the former chief justice's own professional lifetime -- a span of years that included the appointments of such judicial luminaries as Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black and Felix Frankfurter. Such praise was no empty exaggeration. ...
In an earlier day such an appointment would have been celebrated as adding breadth, depth and luster to the highest bench. Instead, the nominee faced a mauling by those who set out not only to destroy him personally but to discredit all that he stood for as a jurist.
This may have been the Fort Sumter of this particular war, but the battleground had formed for decades prior to the first battle. This blot on the history of the Senate began when the judiciary began taking it upon themselves to legislate through judicial fiat rather than restrict itself to using the actual text of the Constitution to decide cases -- and more importantly, to determine its own jurisdiction. The courts became a policy branch with no accountability, and the Supreme Court became a superlegislature.
That informed the twisted process that barred one of the giants of legal scholarship a place on the bench. The point of judicial nominations no longer focused on talent and acumen, but on policy and bias. It followed from the stakes involved that Bork's opponents could not allow him to sit on the court, not because he didn't legitimately qualify for the appointment, but because they didn't like his politics. It presaged all of the judicial confirmations that followed in Senates controlled by both parties, and at the center of all lies Roe v Wade, the decision that resulted from a ridiculous presumption that the Constitution had emanations and penumbras that overrode state rights and legislative jurisdiction.
Only a return to judicial modesty and strict construction can end the fight that Ted Kennedy started on the back of Robert Bork. And only by opening our eyes to the Iranian war against the US can we deal rationally with the threat the mullahcracy poses to our interests.
California Wildfires: Media Blame Another Natural Disaster on Bush
CA: In fire's path, lessons learned
From the spittle-flecked TV-shout fest, Hardball With Chris Matthews, via YouTube:
California LT Governor John Garamendi Bashes George Bush
Not a sparrow falls
By the way, someone should tell me. Garamendi about the thousands of Marines on hand at Camp Pendleton and elsewhere in the (previously) Golden State.
But even Leathernecks cant fight Mother Nature and overcome decades of environmentalist-driven bad policy.
The Drudge Report has obtained documents that appear to show conclusively that Scott Beauchamp fabricated the stories that he wrote for the New Republic. These documents include a transcript of New Republic editor Frank Foer's telephone interview of Beauchamp, in which Beauchamp declines to vouch for, or answer questions about, his own stories--which causes Foer to say that "we just can't, in good conscience, continue to defend the piece."
Drudge also has documents from the Army's investigation, including Beauchamp's signed confession that his articles included "gross exaggerations and inaccurate allegations of misconduct" by his fellow servicemen. The third document is the Army's summary of the results of its investigation, which found that Beauchamp "completely fabricated" the story of the disfigured woman, and that his tales of finding a Saddam-era mass grave and of servicemen running down Iraqi dogs were false and "completely unfounded."
Maybe the New Republic will finally have something to say about the story.
Somebody has slipped the relevant documents in the Beauchamp scandal over the transom to the Drudge Report: a telephone transcript of the September 7 call between Beauchamp and TNR editors Franklin Foer and Peter Scoblic, Beuachamp's memorandum recanting the tall tales Beauchamp recounted in his TNR Baghdad diarist "Shock troops" column (smartly sent down the memory hole by "the editors"), and the Army's official report on Beauchamp's allegations. It's too late to say that it's the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning. It's closer to the end that we have previewed here (part 1), here (part 2), and here (part 3). "The editors" have taken the personal scandal of Scott Thomas Beauchamp and turned it into an institutional debacle.
It takes a Texan to spend big in the White House, it appears. According to McClatchy -- and to no one's surprise -- George Bush has presided over the largest expansion of federal spending since Lyndon Johnson, another Texan with a predilection for expansive spending. The rate of increase for discretionary spending in the Bush administration has outstripped that of LBJ, 5.3% to 4.6% (via Memeorandum): Posted by Ed Morrissey on October 24, 2007 10:05 AM | Comments (16)
IN THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR: Media myths about the Jena 6. "The media got most of the basics wrong. In fact, I have never before witnessed such a disgrace in professional journalism. Myths replaced facts, and journalists abdicated their solemn duty to investigate every claim because they were seduced by a powerfully appealing but false narrative of racial injustice."
The narrative was right, but the facts were wrong. Where have I heard that before?
DREAM Act Fails Senate Test Vote
Procedure helps to eliminate sleep apnea
Parkinson's Institute research shows that nicotine reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesias
Mexico, one of the world's biggest oil producers, is running out-so where did all the money go? certainly not into infrastructure of job creation??
Need a gun death vs. others sheet (Vanity)
Causes of accidental death in the USA in 2002
Risk is 1 in
Annual Lifetime
Any transport accident 5953 77
Car occupant
17625 228
Air and space
440951 5704
Accidental poisoning 16407 212
Any fall
17712 229
Fall from chair or bed
366804 4745
Fall on steps or stairs
180188 2331
Accidental drowning 83534 1081
Smoke, fire, flames 91149 1179
Firearms discharge 377876 4888
Lightning 4362746 56439
Cataclysmic storm 4570496 59127
http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/Risk/top15usa.html
Today, the odds are a million to one, against a child in the U.S. dying in a firearm accident.
Firearms are involved in 0.6% of accidental deaths nationally. Most accidental deaths involve, or are due to, motor vehicles (39%), poisoning (18%), falls (16%), suffocation (5%), drowning (2.9%), fires (2.8%), medical mistakes (2.2%), environmental factors (1.2%), and bicycles and tricycles (0.7%). Among children: motor vehicles (45%), suffocation (18%), drowning (14%), fires (9%), bicycles and tricycles (2.4%), falls (2%), poisoning (1.6%),environmental factors (1.5%), and medical mistakes (0.8%).
http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?id=120
Excellent article and graphics
|
||
Picking a Winner in Clean-Coal Technology Well, you don't see something like this every day --An Australian barmaid has been fined for crushing beer cans between her bare breasts while an off-duty colleague has been fined for hanging spoons from her friend's nipples, police said... C'mon- we gotta see those Jugs O' Doom... |
Too many abortions: Lord Steel | -- Lord Steel, architect of the 1967 Abortion Act, says today that abortion is being used as a form of contraception in Britain and admits he never anticipated "anything like" the current number of terminations when leading the campaign for reform. |
http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/consumer/a/healthyforests.htm
Are they to blame? Who in the MSM will cover it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
The Nation has an article on "Hillary's Mystery Money Men". Lot's of interesting stuff.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071105/baker_federman
good anti virus software(vanity post)
The National Electronic Vaccine Tracking Registry
Privacy Lost: These Phones Can Find You
MRSA 'Deadlier Than Bioweapons'
FairTax is anything but
A democracy is always temporary in nature--"Whether its a democracy or a republic or some combination of the two is irrelevant. The founders had the right idea. The franchise (right to vote) should be limited to property owners - or even better to taxpayers. This would minimize the effect of people voting themselves gifts from the public treasury.
Avoiding WWIII
Public School Parents are Slow Learners
Moonbat Alert!
Bobby Jindal win due to "ethnic cleansing" (leftist bloggers claim)