Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
Ott's notes even stated that the dog did NOT hit at DW's...and there were several items in the affidavit for warrant that were false.
933 posted on 01/15/2003 5:17:15 PM PST by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 931 | View Replies ]


To: Rheo
Ott's notes even stated that the dog did NOT hit at DW's...L

I didn't say the dog "hit", I said the dog's reaction--and that was true and was used in the search warrant affidavit. They took pains to say the handler said he couldn't call the reaction a "hit", but it was a reaction of interest.

The dog also reacted (not hit) upstairs, but I don't recall seeing that in the affidavit.

935 posted on 01/15/2003 5:31:16 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 933 | View Replies ]

To: Rheo
Rheo I read where there were 5 affidavids used to support search warrants during the investigation of DW. These affidavids were released at the S.D. Courthouse.

Have you read all 5 ?

939 posted on 01/15/2003 5:46:32 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 933 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson