Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
They were not testifying - this information was sealed - Judge Mudd ruled that their statements were not admissable in court.
Have you confused these hearings with the actual trial?
858 posted on 01/15/2003 12:07:11 PM PST by EllaMinnow (get real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies ]


To: redlipstick
Ok. I stand corrected. Lying to a JUDGE in a court of law, during a HEARING, in order to violate a U.S. citizen and California citizens rights, is OKEYDOKEY.
862 posted on 01/15/2003 12:27:09 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick; All
Answer this, if you know. And since you have law books.

Are not police officers under oath during a hearing? Aren't they under oath pretty much all the time as a consequence of being an officer of the law?

I am not telling anyone what is the law here, I am asking. Just want it cleared up.

865 posted on 01/15/2003 12:30:04 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson