Police didn't interview enough people... Ridiculous, probably. It was showing that based on the reasons DW was a suspect, that many more people should have been included than it was probably possible to interview.
The porn, etc. was to prove sexual deviancy as a motive for the kidnap/murder...... I understand. So why wasn't Brooke Rowland questioned?
They said he KIDNAPPED, therefore he killed her, he killed her, there for he kidnapped.
I apologize. You are correct, it was KIDNAP, not RAPE, as you state. And this was the crux of the case.
taking custody of a minor child makes you legally responsible for their safety.
And I still say that the whole case rests on this issue, and the physical evidence was what provided PROOF in the mind of the jury, yet there are reasons to discard this physical evidence. But all of them are no better than the interpretations that come out each Day on things DW said.
Overall, I have no doubt that the things you just said are true, and legally accepted in a court of law. You have said you are a lawyer, so you would know more about that than I do.
BUT, what if that evidence was planted? What if the LE's were so convinced they had their man? What if they were told, we will get him, not matter what it takes, then one or two of them took matters into their own hands? (As they admittedly have done before)
Would you admit that if they didn't try the KIDNAP and MURDER together they would have lost the case ??????
I will read your answer, if you chose to do so, tomorrow as I have to leave now.
Good day, and God Bless you too.