Kim! I was on my H.S. debate team, too! And we did have to alternate pro and con. (I remember fossil fuel vs. non-fossil fuel debates. Scintillating stuff! LOL)
A perfect illustration is my post #670 where I'm listening to River on the radio tell what is in the documents and UCANSEE2 posts a hysterical reply in #676 ranting on about this post and he has clearly misunderstood what I wrote.
My post clearly said that in the docs Ott describes what Westerfield said to him, Ott.
UCANSEE2 goes on a tear thinking River is telling about something Westerfield said to her.
This was just the latest in a long line of examples of something being twisted out of all recognition.
Sigh.