To: Rheo
He was sleeping plenty on the reenactment, that's for sure.
To: UCANSEE2
What really bothers me, UCAN, is that you claim to have watched (some) of the interview tapes, yet you continue to portray DW as an innocent/tricked/naive/just being helpful citizen being victimized by dishonest LE.
What you completely ignore in the LE motive/behavior is a very real, very missing 7 yr. old girl and her distraught family in their minds at all time, and the desperate desire of recovery. They don't know for sure if she's actually dead, or just badly injured and slowly dying somewhere. Fact is, Danielle could have died of slow internal hemoraghing/exposure laying nude and unconscious in the cold February weather. The cops don't know and miracles can happen, if they could just get DW to talk ASAP.
What I see is an anxious, talkative, equivocating, dissembling, lying man, who knows he has done something very wrong and is trying to find a path that deflects fault/harm from himself.
690 posted on
01/13/2003 6:37:24 PM PST by
Valpal1
To: redlipstick
Sean Hannity thinks DW basically confessed (most people do) on the just released tapes.
Will he be accused of merely listening to what the media tells him to think?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson