[truth_seeker]

"As long as Dave could mantain the appearance of a successful, single guy, he would have a steady supply of consenting females. Men have that advantage, even as they get older."

Or looking at the overall big picture, it appears Dave went after females, widely varied in age, consenting or not, even as he got older.

It similarly appears that as he got older, the females got younger. And due to age, could not legally consent.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not suggesting that ping pong balls, flashlights, homemade movies of neighbors, child-porn collections, or previously being accused of rape of an adult, are evidence of murder of a child.

But when coupled with blood, dna, various fibres, a strange and untimely desert journey, and four failed polygraph tests, it does add up, boy doesn't it though, to law enforcement, the DA, the preliminary hearing judge, twelve jurors, and reasonable folks.

(Or else all of the abovementioned factors result from a strange coincidence, coupled with some pretty cleverly administered conspiracies.) ** The mathmatical probability of which is vitually the same as the concept of zero.

(And then, pray tell, after all the trouble, those darn San Diego voters go and fail to re-elect the DA, anyway.) ** Which is a fact.

[cyncooper]

Or looking at the overall big picture, it appears Dave went after females, widely varied in age, consenting or not, even as he got older.

Don't expect this character to acknowledge the facts here.

He dismisses the episode with Westerfield sneaking into his niece's bedroom and the fingers in the mouth business, by calling the niece a "nitwit". See? Everyone is of low character in his view except (in his sick and distorted view) the much putupon and falsley maligned Westerfield. He is saving his scorn for the van Dams and Dusek.

Your voice of commonsense and sanity is much appreciated.

[Freedom2specul8]

I think truth_seeker's reply was great. I would add that DW is a sick pervert, who enjoys watching children be in pain. There is no way you CW can convince me of otherwise. Try as you might, no matter how much you defend DW..you will never convince me that he felt anything but intense interest in seeing kids in pain. In fact, his interest in it grew so much he had to experience it.

[CW_Conservative]

Don't get me wrong. I'm not suggesting that ping pong balls, flashlights, homemade movies of neighbors, child-porn collections, or previously being accused of rape of an adult, are evidence of murder of a child.

But when coupled with blood, dna, various fibres, a strange and untimely desert journey, and four failed polygraph tests, it does add up, boy doesn't it though, to law enforcement, the DA, the preliminary hearing judge, twelve jurors, and reasonable folks.

(Or else all of the abovementioned factors result from a strange coincidence, coupled with some pretty cleverly administered conspiracies.) ** The mathmatical probability of which is vitually the same as the concept of zero.

Thank you for posting what the "reasonable folks" think.

Interesting how the "reasonable folks" view is precisely the same as the government's and their media whores.

I continue to have serious doubts, nonetheless.