[paulklenk]

The more I read your article, the more I think it's one of the least intelligent things I've read on FR [or anywhere else] in a long time. It's too stupid to be taken seriously as film criticism, but not clever enough to be taken as parody, and too lame in its observations to even merit reading it. What's the point?

[Ignatz]

I thought it was a very humurous, tongue-in-cheek article. Others here thought the same.

Of course, lacking your superior intellect (and overt superiority in general), we are often amused by the sublime. What fools we must be!