Posted on 12/21/2002 1:15:50 PM PST by vannrox
|
|||
Being ugly is attractive too |
|||
10:23 06 September 01 | |||
Rachel Nowak, Melbourne |
|||
Beauty really is in the eye of the beholder. Rather than always chasing the best-looking members of the opposite sex, some animals prefer mates that the majority find decidedly unattractive.
"Ugly individuals can sometimes do better than good-looking ones," says evolutionary biologist Rob Brooks of the University of New South Wales in Sydney. If the same holds true for people, then it may be time to stop worrying about how closely you adhere to the Hollywood ideal of attractiveness.
Studies of how birds, fish and people choose mates have found that members of the same species tend to find the same things attractive. For instance, peahens prefer to mate with brightly coloured, long-tailed peacocks, while women prefer tall men. Those attractive traits are supposed to signal beneficial characteristics such as an increased chance that any offspring will survive.
But there are problems with the idea that all animals prefer the same features. For a start, you would expect birds and fish of the same species - and perhaps people too - to look far more similar than they do, because evolutionary forces would have moulded them into a super-attractive archetype.
What's more, most of us know from experience that one person's dog is another person's sex god - and that makes some evolutionary biologists cautious about assuming that animals have only one ideal of attractiveness. "People say 'I don't like what my mate down the pub likes'. How do you reconcile that with a universal Hollywood idea of attractiveness?" says Brooks.
To find out, he joined forces with John Endler, an ecological geneticist at James Cook University in Townsville, to observe how individual female guppies choose between different males. They found that although all the females liked males with bright orange spots and large tails, a minority of females also liked males with black markings.
"It's a nice result," says Raoul Mulder, an evolutionary ecologist at the University of Melbourne. "It explains why certain very rare colour patterns continue to persist in guppy populations."
Brooks says that previous studies failed to detect idiosyncratic mate choice because they looked at what whole populations found attractive on average. "But you don't mate with an average, you mate with an individual," he says. There may be a good reason that attractiveness is idiosyncratic, Brooks says. What benefits one individual might not necessarily benefit another.
For example, says Brooks, this may be what happens with immune system proteins called MHC molecules. The more diverse a selection you inherit from your parents, the better equipped you are to fight off disease. Men with different MHCs smell differently, and not only can women detect that difference, but they also tend to prefer the smell of men whose MHCs complement their own. This makes sense because any children resulting from such a pairing would have more diverse MHCs (New Scientist, 10 February, p 36).
"MHC is a great example of a real genetic benefit to mate choice that isn't uniform," says Brooks.
More at: Evolution (vol 55, p 1644)
|
|||
10:23 06 September 01 | |||
|
|||
|
|||
© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.
|
|||
|
What a profound thing to say. And so pointless as well.
Indeed, the non-uniformity of attraction allows many people to be happy with their mates without having to be jealous of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.