Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Thanks for posting the full text - it's in agreement with what I summarized. Lincoln's correspondence with Washburne, Anderson, Scott indicated he was re-enforcing and resupplying his troops. He told them to use force as necessary.
149 posted on 11/26/2002 6:24:29 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: stainlessbanner
I must have made a mistake posting the English version rather than the southron version because you are obviously confused.

I am directed by the President of the United States to notify you to expect an attempt will be made to supply Fort-Sumpter [sic] with provisions only..."

It is perfectly clear that Lincoln would have maintained the status quo in terms of arms and men had the south not opposed the action. If the guns of Charleston had remained quiet then the rescue force would have landed bread and beans, but no bullets. Then nothing would have changed and a peaceful negotiated settlement might have been achieved.

...and that, if such attempt be not resisted, no effort to throw in men, arms, or ammunition, will be made, without further notice, or in case of an attack upon the Fort.

Peaceful resupply would have not resulted in aggression on the part of the North. No aggressive acts had been made to date and none need have occured except that the south was not interested in a peaceful solution or the status quo. They would have Sumter, with war if at all possible. They got their wish.

150 posted on 11/26/2002 6:32:35 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson