Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: agrandis
GOPCapitalist thinks he's FOOLING people that the Nazis were National Socialists? What a boob! Everyone knows the Nazis were not NATIONAL SOCIALISTS!

Hitler was stroking the left until he felt he could do without them. He took power in 1933. The Night of the Long Knives was in 1934.

In 1935 he abolished all labor unions.

That ain't much stroking.

Walt

843 posted on 11/18/2002 12:57:05 PM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
Yeah, the Soviet Union was just full of independent labor unions, too.

To say that socialism is the opposite, by definition, of nationlism is like saying that apples, by definition, are the opposite of oranges. It makes no sense. It makes even less sense than that, actually, because nationalism is not in any way exclusive of socialism, or vice versa. The current Chinese regime is both, for instance. Socialists usually do have a dream of spreading the revolution globaly, but there are mant ways to attempt this, some of which in no way exclude nationlism. The multi-cultural (really just uni-cultural) socialism of our own Left is equally as dangerous and potentially murderous as national socialism, BTW.

847 posted on 11/18/2002 1:09:20 PM PST by agrandis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 843 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
Hitler was stroking the left until he felt he could do without them.

That must've been to the very end of his life then because Joseph Goebbels was a philosophical marxist of the far left. Hitler stroked Goebbels to the very end of his life and named the latter his successor as Fuehrer before committing suicide. Though they had a political falling out later in the war, Hermann Goering had his own socialist tendencies as well and was stroked by Hitler to the latter days of the reich.

In 1935 he abolished all labor unions.

As I noted earlier, Soviet Poland (as in the Soviet puppet state of Poland for those of you who are too stupid to figure out what that means, Walt) wasn't very fond of labor unions either. Nor was the Vietcong for that matter. That didn't make any of them any less socialist though.

855 posted on 11/18/2002 1:16:40 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 843 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson