Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Just as he doesn't associate the slaughter of 623,000 Americans with Lincoln, neither does he associate the guilt of the Islamics with the murders, in both cases blaming the innocent for the actions of the guilty.

Yep, Walt's a real Blame America Firster with a heavy tilt to the far left. That's the funny thing about it.

Just as Walt's statements about the civil war are interchangable with those by Karl Marx on the same subject, his statements about the Gulf War and 9/11 are virtually indistinguishable with comments on the same subject from the likes of Noam Chomsky, The Nation magazine, Democrats.com, Barbara Lee, Cynthia McKinney and any other given left wing wacko extremist out there on the anti-war picket lines holding banners about the mohammedan "victims" of American "intolerance."

Why they permit filth such as Walt to continue to post here is beyond me, as I firmly believe that not a one of us, not even a yankee, could get away with some of the left wing bullsh!t he's peddled here for the last three years. His comments today have been especially kooky.

573 posted on 11/15/2002 10:50:02 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies ]


To: 4ConservativeJustices; Twodees; billbears; Aurelius
The more I think about, it the more I am amazed at the heavy leftist tilt to the nonsense Walt has pushed here in the last couple of days. Just look at a sample of his statements:

"All these deaths of U.S. citizens --the death of EVERY U.S. citizen killed by Arab terror in the United States, can be laid directly at the feet of George Bush I." - Walt, 11/15/02
Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?page=452#448

"I'll say again that based on what I knew in 1992, I would vote for Bill Clinton ten times out of ten before I would vote for George Bush Sr." - Walt, 11/15/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?q=1&&page=401#420

"As you doubtless know, the separation of powers in that Pact with the Devil we call our Constitution, gives only Congress the right to raise and spend money." - Walt, 11/15/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?page=432#432

"Nationalism and socialism are opposites." - Walt, 11/15/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?page=570#516

"First of all, the AJC [Atlanta Journal-Constitution] is -not- an "ultra-leftist" newspaper, and you know it." - Walt, 11/13/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/784464/posts?page=70#70

"The Reagan administration acted in secret to pervert the Constitution...I feel that admiration for Reagan has rightly diminished over time, and rightly so." - Walt, 11/15/02
SOURCE: I feel that admiration for Reagan has rightly diminished over time, and rightly so.

Think about all that and think about Walt said. It summarizes nicely into the following:

1. He blamed George H. W. Bush and America for the 9/11 terrorist attacks, not the actual terrorists themselves.
2. He proudly announced his devoted support for Bill Clinton.
3. He dismissed the United States Constitution as an essentially worthless pact with the devil.
4. He asserted the non-existant incompatability of socialism with nationalism in an attempt to absolve the left of its role in Nazi Germany.
5. He defended one of the most notoriously left wing newspapers in the country from charges of its liberal bias.
6. He blasted the Reagan administration with charges of corruption while simultaneously giving Clinton a pass, and then expressed hopes that Reagan's stature would diminish with history.

Now tell me. Tell me the name of any freeper other than Walt who could get away with flooding this message board with any ONE of those things without some sort of warning if not banning for being a liberal disrupter. I venture to speculate they are few and far between. As with all liberal Democrats though, the rules simply don't seem to apply with Walt.

574 posted on 11/15/2002 11:11:49 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]

The more I think about, it the more I am amazed at the heavy leftist tilt to the nonsense Walt has pushed here in the last couple of days. Just look at a sample of his statements:

"All these deaths of U.S. citizens --the death of EVERY U.S. citizen killed by Arab terror in the United States, can be laid directly at the feet of George Bush I." - Walt, 11/15/02
Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?page=452#448

"I'll say again that based on what I knew in 1992, I would vote for Bill Clinton ten times out of ten before I would vote for George Bush Sr." - Walt, 11/15/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?q=1&&page=401#420

"As you doubtless know, the separation of powers in that Pact with the Devil we call our Constitution, gives only Congress the right to raise and spend money." - Walt, 11/15/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?page=432#432

"Nationalism and socialism are opposites." - Walt, 11/15/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?page=570#516

"First of all, the AJC [Atlanta Journal-Constitution] is -not- an "ultra-leftist" newspaper, and you know it." - Walt, 11/13/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/784464/posts?page=70#70

"The Reagan administration acted in secret to pervert the Constitution...I feel that admiration for Reagan has rightly diminished over time, and rightly so." - Walt, 11/15/02
SOURCE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/786927/posts?page=432#432

Think about all that and think about Walt said. It summarizes nicely into the following:

1. He blamed George H. W. Bush and America for the 9/11 terrorist attacks, not the actual terrorists themselves.
2. He proudly announced his devoted support for Bill Clinton.
3. He dismissed the United States Constitution as an essentially worthless pact with the devil.
4. He asserted the non-existant incompatability of socialism with nationalism in an attempt to absolve the left of its role in Nazi Germany.
5. He defended one of the most notoriously left wing newspapers in the country from charges of its liberal bias.
6. He blasted the Reagan administration with charges of corruption while simultaneously giving Clinton a pass, and then expressed hopes that Reagan's stature would diminish with history.

Now tell me. Tell me the name of any freeper other than Walt who could get away with flooding this message board with any ONE of those things without some sort of warning if not banning for being a liberal disrupter. I venture to speculate they are few and far between. As with all liberal Democrats though, the rules simply don't seem to apply with Walt.

575 posted on 11/15/2002 11:20:11 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson