[Non-Sequitur]

Any further substantive argument delivered to you would have no more effect than if I delivered them to a wooden post. You have eyes but do not see. Wigfall was clearly talking about southern tariffs, not Northern ones.

[GOPcapitalist]

Any further substantive argument delivered to you

For their to be further substantive argument from you requires that there exists prior substantive argument from you. You have provided prior argument but it is deficient in substance, hence the problem with your statement.

would have no more effect than if I delivered them to a wooden post. You have eyes but do not see.

Again, I need only note the author of that statement's recent treatment of Wigfall's speech regarding the Northern object of his address. In other words, you are projecting again.

Wigfall was clearly talking about southern tariffs, not Northern ones.

So when Wigfall said "you" and "your" to identify the object of that part of his speech, he was really saying "us" and "our" in reference to himself and the South? Strange...

[WhiskeyPapa]

Any further substantive argument delivered to you would have no more effect than if I delivered them to a wooden post. You have eyes but do not see. Wigfall was clearly talking about southern tariffs, not Northern ones.

Don't call GOPCap a moron. That's my perogative.

Walt