Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
And last time I looked, the Supremacy clause does not include international law, nor does it require US laws to operate in foreign countries.

Seems like the parties trying to get possession of the ships and cargoes were playing the international law card. The Court ruled that the president did have power to blockade "the so-called confederate states" (the Court's phrase), as well as suppress the rebellion, based on the Militia Act and another act from 1807.

Walt

1,529 posted on 12/09/2002 10:17:45 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1525 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
The Court ruled that the president did have power to blockade "the so-called confederate states" (the Court's phrase), as well as suppress the rebellion, based on the Militia Act and another act from 1807.

"On this first question, therefore, we are of the opinion that the President had a right, jure belli, to institute a blockade of ports in possession of the States in rebellion which neutrals are bound to regard."

The Court's phrase.

1,532 posted on 12/09/2002 11:21:16 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1529 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson