Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
2. The Northern businessmen were for appeasement not war."

Were they for appeasement to the point of allowing the port at Charleston to operate as a duty freeport? What would that have done to Northern commerce? What about the whole question of Federal tarrifs to protect private business?

1,485 posted on 12/08/2002 7:28:29 AM PST by fightu4it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1480 | View Replies ]


To: fightu4it
Were they for appeasement to the point of allowing the port at Charleston to operate as a duty freeport? What would that have done to Northern commerce? What about the whole question of Federal tarrifs to protect private business?

To allow Charleston to operate as a duty free port while requiring tariffs be collected at all other ports would have been unconstituional. Had the southern secession been allowed then Charleston could have operated as a duty free port AND given out lollypops to the crews of the ships that called there and that would not have had any affect on the traffic in and out of the Northern ports at all.

1,494 posted on 12/08/2002 8:35:23 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1485 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson