Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Regarding the "victory" being a butt-whipping - that might be true if it were decided on the field of battle against MILITARY tagets and combatants.

It wasn't 1740.

Perhaps you'd prefer what Hood did at Franklin. That attack included what has been called the most deadly hour in the whole war. Hood wrecked his army to no purpose.

Sherman obtained his objectives after capturing Atlanta without facing any important opposition at all.

It was Sun Tzu who said that the acme of skill was not to fight and win 100 battles; the acme of skill is to obtain your objectives without fighting.

You just don't like the result.

I'll take Sherman over Hood any day; in fact, I'll take Sherman over any rebel general. Hood -was- especially clueless - he sent his men forward after having been present the third day at Gettysburg.

Walt

1,407 posted on 12/04/2002 6:44:31 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1398 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
Sherman obtained his objectives after capturing Atlanta without facing any important opposition at all.

Rather than face a military force, Sherman (Spit!) finally chose to attack cilvilian targets, old men, women and children. What a coward.

1,429 posted on 12/04/2002 9:30:13 PM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1407 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson